Turkish gov’t, opposition seek a way out of judicial crisis

Turkish gov’t, opposition seek a way out of judicial crisis

Turkish gov’t, opposition seek a way out of judicial crisis

‘I will not bring the entire judiciary under suspicion,’ Prime Minister Erdoğan says. AA photo

The government of Turkey could take a step back on draft legislation to tighten the ruling party’s grip on the judiciary contingent on some give-and-take from the opposition, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has said.

“If the opposition offers to make a joint constitutional amendment, then we will freeze the bill, if needed; we won’t take it to the General Assembly. Today’s meetings will be determinant here,” said the ruling Justice and Development Party’s (AKP) leader, addressing a parliamentary group meeting of his party.

“During the work on drafting a new Constitution, the HSYK [the Supreme Council of Judges and Prosecutors] issue proceeded to a certain point,” Erdoğan said, referring to the work by the now-dissolved parliamentary Constitution Conciliation Commission.

The meetings Erdoğan referred to were held by Justice Minister Bekir Bozdağ, along with AKP deputy parliamentary group chair Nurettin Canikli. The two held meetings with the deputy parliamentary group chairs of the main opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP), the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) and the Peace and Democracy Party (BDP).

“The constitutional amendment is far beyond legal amendments. Exactly like in the case with the RTÜK [the Radio and Television Supreme Council], the groups at the Parliament will find [places] on the HSYK according to [the numbers in Parliament],” said Erdoğan.

RTÜK has nine members elected by Parliament for a period of six years from a pool of candidates nominated by political parties, in proportion to the number of seats they hold in the legislature.

“If we can pass a constitutional amendment of a few articles, we will freeze legal arrangement work and move on our way with a constitutional amendment,” Erdoğan said.

The move by the government came a day after President Abdullah Gül took the initiative and held a series of meetings with both Erdoğan and the opposition leaders in a bid to defuse the row over the judiciary stemming from a damaging corruption scandal.

The proposed legislation, seen by critics as a bid to head off a widening corruption probe that has rocked the government to its core, has come under fire from the domestic opposition as well as the European Union and the United States.

Gül has personally intervened to try to end the latest crisis to confront the government just weeks before the country goes to the polls in municipal elections in March.
Meanwhile, Gül held a meeting yesterday with Ali Alkan, head of the Supreme Court of Appeals.


After meeting with the AKP delegation, along with fellow colleagues Engin Altay and Muharrem İnce, CHP deputy parliamentary group chair Akif Hamzaçebi sounded receptive to the proposal from the ruling party. 

The proposal outlined a joint commission work either with the participation of three or four political parties, Hamzaçebi said, adding that it also included the option for a commission solely composed of the AKP and the CHP.

Echoing what CHP leader Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu already stated Jan. 13, Hamzaçebi said they told the AKP delegation that in addition to the withdrawal of the bill from Parliament, they would also insist that the government give assurances that it would allow for the proceeding of corruption and graft investigations.

They will present the AKP’s proposal to the CHP’s Central Executive Board (MYK) and Kılıçdaroğlu, Hamzaçebi said, noting that the issue would be discussed at the next MYK meeting, either today or tomorrow.

Contrary to the CHP, the MHP was rigid, with deputy parliamentary group chair Oktay Vural stating that the party did not find a constitutional amendment about the HSYK appropriate given the incidents Turkey has been experiencing.

“As the MHP, we have stated that we don’t find such constitutional amendment appropriate, that bribery and corruption investigation which is in the judicial process should continue, and that such an intervention could particularly aim at intervening in the judicial institutions in order to cover up the bribery and corruption investigation,” Vural said.

Shuttling to meetings

Following their meetings with the CHP and the MHP representatives, Bozdağ and Canikli held a meeting with Erdoğan at the latter’s office in Parliament. Two other deputy parliamentary group chairs of the party, Mahir Ünal and Ahmet Aydın, also attended the meeting.

Afterwards, Bozdağ and Canikli proceeded to their meeting with the BDP and gathered with deputy parliamentary group chairs, İdris Baluken and Pervin Buldan, as well as Batman deputy Bengi Yıldız.
Speaking after the meeting, Bozdağ described it as “positive.”

Earlier in the day, addressing his party’s parliamentary group meeting, BDP co-leader Selahattin Demirtaş said they were ready to exert any effort that would help build a fair judicial system.
“What is right is the constitution of an independent and impartial judiciary. If a constitutional amendment is needed, and is needed, we are ready for that,” said Demirtaş.