China ‘has tools to handle trade war’ Central bank

China ‘has tools to handle trade war’ Central bank

China ‘has tools to handle trade war’ Central bank

China’s central bank chief said on June 7 the country has plenty of policy tools left to handle the trade war with the United States.

There is “tremendous” room to counter the deepening trade war, People’s Bank of China governor Yi Gang said in an interview with Bloomberg TV.

“We have plenty of room in interest rates, we have plenty of room in required reserve ratio rate, and also for the fiscal, monetary policy toolkit, I think the room for adjustment is tremendous,” Yi said on Bloomberg TV.

Ties between China and the US have deteriorated sharply after trade negotiations stalled last month without a deal to lift bruising tariffs on goods worth $360 billion in two-way trade.

China said on June 6 that it would soon release detailed information about a planned blacklist of “unreliable” foreign companies and individuals, that analysts expect will target firms cutting off supplies to Chinese tech giant Huawei.

Last month the U.S. Commerce Department placed Huawei and dozens of its affiliates on an “entity list” on grounds of national security, curbing its access to crucial U.S.-made components and software, though a 90-day reprieve was later issued.

Yi has participated in several rounds of the trade negotiations with Washington and is scheduled to meet with U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin this weekend during the G-20 gathering of financial policymakers in Japan.

He said the meeting with Mnuchin would be “productive talk, as always,” but trade war discussions would be “uncertain and difficult,” according to Bloomberg News.

China’s yuan, or renminbi, currency has also rapidly depreciated against the dollar as trade tensions have ramped up in recent weeks, nearing the critical seven to the dollar exchange rate.

The central bank has long prevented the yuan from falling below seven, but Yi hinted the bank may no longer defend the currency at that level.

“I don’t think along this mathematical scale any number is more important [than] the other number,” he said.