Fortunately, we have not closed Gülen schools

Fortunately, we have not closed Gülen schools

When I was invited to become one of the judges in the International Turkish Olympiad, I was initially surprised. I was also a bit embarrassed because I never considered myself to be an expert in Turkish songs and folk songs, but I could not turn the offer down because I did not want to offend my interlocutors. 

I have always been a supporter of Fethullah Gülen schools and the competitions they organized. Because I oppose those who said “these schools should be closed, they are a source of reaction,” I have suffered many troubles. 

Look at the stage we have reached now. Yesterday, we wanted to close them, today we carry them on top of our heads. Fortunately, we have not closed them. Fortunately, we have not acted with a narrow-mind. 

I went to the finals Tuesday night with these thoughts in my mind. The scene I saw was amazing. A standing ovation occurred in the stadium where 15,000 people had gathered. 

It was worth watching young people 14 to 15-years-old, who had enrolled in Gülen schools in 110 different countries and learned Turkish, take the stage to perform beautiful songs and folk songs. 
More importantly, it required even more skills to be able to successfully organize such a gigantic event. The result was just wonderful. 

The aspect that affected me the most was that each performance and each detail were decided upon after major efforts. Because I know how difficult it is to manage these types of organizations, my admiration multiplied. I expand my respects to the teachers of these schools and everyone else who worked on this event. 

Actually, to call this competition an “Olympiad” is a bit exaggerated. If it were only called “competition,” it would have been better. It is actually a competition among the Gülen Schools which are highly admired overseas. The one who has worked the most, who has made the best preparation is awarded. 

Is anyone asking Gül? 

The subject of “presidency” has been brought up again. I listened to the speeches given at the recent A Haber interview. The prime minister is discussing how he will govern Turkey after 2014. Erdoğan’s term is ending. He will not be elected again. But the prime minister’s target is to hold onto power until 2023. 

A method is being sought for the continuation of “the Erdoğan years.” 

Which proposal is better, “full presidency” or “half presidency” or the newly emerged idea of “political presidency”?

Abdullah Gül will step in. Erdoğan will replace him, and we are discussing with which powers this will happen. 

Let’s take this one step further. After Erdoğan ascends to Çankaya he will either remain the leader of his party or Abdullah Gül will assume that task. It is even discussed under which circumstances he would accept this. 

This is the question that makes me curious: I wonder whether these topics are being discussed with Gül. Is his opinion ever asked? 

I don’t know, maybe he is being consulted, but I’m concerned. Gül’s body language does not give the impression that he is very content with the situation. 

We are in a process that might create trouble, that might cause conflicts in the future.