Trump’s dangerous dismissal of right-wing militants

Trump’s dangerous dismissal of right-wing militants

Joshua Holland*
In the wake of the bloody havoc in Charlottesville last weekend, and with more white nationalist protests planned for other cities in the weeks ahead, Donald Trump is being widely lambasted for equivocating about who is responsible for the violence.

But his penchant for minimizing the threat of domestic far-right and white supremacist militants isn’t new. Like other conservatives, Trump has avoided confronting this threat. 

The far-right danger was no secret. Following Barack Obama’s election in 2008, experts on radical movements warned that membership in white supremacist and neo-Nazi groups was growing dramatically. 

The Ku Klux Klan experienced some of that growth. But there was also a new generation of white nationalists whose goal was to go mainstream. They wore preppy clothes and claimed they were simply trying to save “European culture” from an ascendant multicultural left. They adopted some of the rhetoric of the civil rights movement, insisting that “white lives matter.” And they expressly targeted young people for recruitment. 

Meanwhile, Trump, his party, and major conservative media figures minimized the threat of these homegrown radicals. According to a U.S. Government Accountability Office report to Congress, the U.S.

Extremist Crime Database recorded a total of 62 fatal “far right extremist-motivated attacks” between September 12, 2001 and December 31, 2016. In contrast, there were 23 fatal assaults by militant Islamists over the same period.

Long before Trump blamed the violence in Charlottesville on “many sides,” he had established a clear pattern of condemning Islamist militants – including an attack that never happened – while ignoring violence by white supremacists. And he enshrined this myopia in policy. In February, Reuters reported that under Trump, a government program to counter violent extremism would focus only on Muslims and “no longer target groups such as white supremacists who have also carried out bombings and shootings in the United States.”

Hours before he allegedly killed a local Charlottesville activist and wounded 19 others, 20-year-old James Alex Fields Jr. marched with a white supremacist group called American Vanguard. The group, which disavowed any connection to Fields, was one of three that were singled out in April by the Anti-Defamation League for their “unprecedented outreach effort to attract and recruit students on American college campuses.” Last month, Jason Wilson reported for the Guardian that many attendees at American Renaissance’s annual convention were “millennials” who “lined up for selfies with Richard Spencer, the president of the white nationalist National Policy Institute think tank.” Jared Taylor, the founder of American Renaissance, told Wilson that his group was being flooded by “hopping mad” young “white guys” who “have been told from infancy that they are the villains of history.”

The rioting and vehicular homicide of neo-Nazis in Charlottesville wasn’t the first time these hopping mad young white guys have turned violent. Fields allegedly perpetrated the fifth attack by white supremacists in the past 26 months. In total, these “lone wolves” were responsible for killing 13 people and wounding 28 others. We can expect more attacks like these in the future. Todd Blodget spent two years working undercover in the white supremacist movement for the FBI. Asked by the Washington Post what kind of person is attracted to these groups, he said, “as a general rule, losers ... It’s often a kid - usually a male, but sometimes a female - who cannot make it in school. He blames all of his problems on someone else, and when they log onto a Web site like this or they go to a meeting like this or they pop in American Resistance records (the leading label for neo-Nazi and white supremacist bands) and it blames other people they already don’t like for their problems, they think, ‘There you go. That’s why I’m a dropout. That’s why I’m smoking crystal meth…That’s why I can’t get a job and hold it. It’s all because of black people.’”

Take out the crystal meth, and it sounds a lot like the pattern of radicalization that we’ve heard so much about in Muslim communities in France, Belgium and the UK. And in Europe, they’re treating it as such. 
But in the U.S., it’s a different story. Mainstream conservatives have consistently balked at any effort to even acknowledge the problem, much less counter it. In 2009, when the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a report on right-wing domestic terrorism, House Minority Leader Rep. John Boehner (R-OH) berated DHS director Janet Napolitano for using the “term (terrorist) to describe American citizens who disagree with the direction Washington Democrats are taking our nation.”

DHS and the FBI have continued to warn of the danger these extremists pose, and conservatives have continued to push back – none with more zeal than Donald Trump. In June, Trump’s DHS rescinded a grant for a group called Life After Hate that’s “dedicated to deradicalizing neo-Nazis and stopping white extremism,” according to Politico. The grant was yanked despite the fact that “the group has seen a twenty-fold increase in requests for help” disengaging from extremist groups “since Election Day.” And alt-right activists have openly celebrated the fact that law enforcement has largely “given them space” since the election.

The white nationalist movement is feeling energized and empowered. There will be more violence. More disaffected kids will be seduced into these violent ideologies. And so long as Republicans refuse to see the threat clearly, the government’s going to do too little to counter their radicalization.

* This abridged article is taken from Reuters