Malaysia jails first person under fake news law
KUALA LUMPUR – Agence France-Presse
The law, passed in early April, makes the deliberate dissemination of false information punishable by up to six years in jail and a hefty fine. It has sparked outrage from rights groups who believe it is aimed at cracking down on dissent.
Salah Salem Saleh Sulaiman, a 46-year-old of Yemeni descent, admitted making and posting on YouTube a video accusing emergency services of responding slowly after a Palestinian Hamas member was gunned down in Kuala Lumpur.
Fadi al-Batsh, said to be a rocket-making expert, was on his way to dawn prayers on April 21 when he was assassinated by motorbike-riding gunmen, a killing his family have blamed on Israel’s spy agency.
The Jewish state has denied it was behind the murder.
The Dane, who did not have a lawyer and was wearing white robes and a green skullcap during a court appearance in Kuala Lumpur, said he was not aware of Malaysia’s laws.
“I agree I did a mistake, because I didn’t ask what is the law of this country,” he said, speaking in English, his hands trembling.
A clip of the video played in court, which lasted almost two minutes, showed him speaking in Arabic and complaining about what he claimed was the slow response of the police and ambulance service after the shooting.
Authorities have disputed his claims.Judge Zaman Mohamad Noor sentenced him to a week in jail, including time already served since his April 23 arrest, and fined him 10,000 ringgit ($2,500).
If he cannot pay the fine, then he will have to serve another month in jail, the judge said.
The Dane, who had been on a 10-day visit to Malaysia when the crime was committed, said he did not have enough money to pay the fine.
He said he had three wives and six children.
The law banning fake news has sparked concern the government is seeking to crack down on criticism, particularly with a general election looming on May 9.
Leading independent news portal Malaysiakini last week mounted the first legal challenge against the legislation, arguing it breaches constitutional guarantees to freedom of speech.