Saudi executes 88th person this year, topping 2014 total

Saudi executes 88th person this year, topping 2014 total

RIYADH - Agence France-Presse

Saudi King Salman bin Abdulaziz (C). AFP Photo

Saudi Arabia on May 26 carried out its 88th execution so far this year, surpassing the total for all of 2014 despite activists' concerns that trials are not conducted fairly.

The interior ministry identified the latest to be put to death as Saudis Awad al-Rowaili and Lafi al-Shammary, who were convicted of smuggling amphetamines.
 
They were executed in the northern region of Jawf, the ministry said in statements carried by the official Saudi Press Agency.
 
Another Saudi, Mohammed al-Shihri, was separately put to death in the southwestern region of Asir for murder.
 
The conservative Islamic kingdom executed 87 people in 2014, according to an AFP tally.
 
Those beheaded this year include Siti Zainab, an Indonesian domestic worker convicted of murder despite concerns about her mental health, according to the Indonesian newspaper Kompas.
 
Jakarta summoned Riyadh's ambassador over her case, a rare diplomatic incident linked to Saudi Arabia's executions, around half of which involve foreigners.
 
Also among this year's dead are at least eight Yemenis, 10 Pakistanis, Syrians, Jordanians, and individuals from Myanmar, the Philippines, India, Chad, Eritrea and Sudan.
 
Saudi Arabia ranked among the world's top five executioners in 2014, according to rights group Amnesty International.
 
Under the Gulf nation's strict version of Islamic sharia law, drug trafficking, rape, murder, apostasy and armed robbery are all punishable by death.
 
Executions are carried out in public, mostly by beheading with a sword.
 
A surge in executions began towards the end of the reign of King Abdullah, who died on January 23.
 
It accelerated this year under his successor King Salman, in what Amnesty has called an unprecedented "macabre spike".
 
Activists are unable to explain specific reasons for the surge, and officials have not commented.
 
One activist said the death penalty is carried out only with the king's final approval.
 
"So if the king is strict he will sign this paper," said the activist, asking for anonymity.
         
Salman has adopted a more assertive foreign policy, and in April promoted his powerful Interior Minister Mohammed bin Nayef to be crown prince and heir to the throne.
 
The Berlin-based European Saudi Organisation for Human Rights said in a report that the death penalty in the kingdom is "often applied to powerless individuals with no government connection".
 
Ali Adubisi, the group's director, told AFP that economic factors could be leading to a rise in drug crimes. Many are turning to the illegal business "because they are poor", he said.
 
Drug and murder convictions account for the bulk of executions in Saudi Arabia.
 
But according to London-based Amnesty, only crimes of "intentional killings" meet the threshold for use of the death penalty under international human rights standards.
 
It said court proceedings in the country "fall far short" of global norms of fairness.
 
"Trials in death penalty cases are often held in secret. Defendants are rarely allowed formal representation by lawyers" and may be convicted solely on the basis of "confessions", Amnesty said in a report.
 
With the number of beheadings soaring, the civil service this month advertised for eight new "executors of retribution".
 
In a country where government officials are not known for their openness, all executions are publicised by the official press agency, and the interior ministry has cited deterrence as a reason for the punishment.
 
The number of executions will rise even higher if death sentences are carried out against nine people who activists say were convicted after demonstrations that began in 2011 by the minority Shiite community.
 
Among them is Shiite cleric Nimr al-Nimr, a driving force behind those protests. Adubisi said three teenagers, aged 15-17 at the time of their arrests, are also among the condemned.
 
Although death sentences can be appealed to higher courts, he said there is "no transparency at all" about which stage the cases have reached, in what can be a lengthy process.
 
"It's a type of torture for these people and their families," he said.