TURKEY
• NATIONAL
Thursday, July 29 2010 19:37 GMT+2
Your time is 
 

TSK cannot defend PM wife's headscarf experience, top commander says

Font Size: Larger|Smaller
Chief of General Staff Gen. İlker Başbuğ (C)

Chief of General Staff Gen. İlker Başbuğ (C)

It is not possible to defend the fact that Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s headscarf-wearing wife was denied access to a military hospital, Turkey’s top general has said.

“Let me put it clearly: This is a special case. Therefore, I believe it is more accurate to look that issue from a humanitarian perspective,” Chief of General Staff Gen. İlker Başbuğ told daily Hürriyet in an interview published Friday.

“I wish that incident had not taken place. I don’t want to accuse anyone; I wish it had not happened,” the top general said. “If we take a look at it from the humanitarian aspect, it is not possible for us to defend that today.”

In a recent televised interview, Erdoğan said his wife, Emine, had been denied entry to a military hospital, the Gülhane Military Medical Academy, or GATA, three years ago when she tried to visit actor Nejat Uygur because she wears a headscarf.

Başbuğ also expressed concerns over the Turkish Armed Forces, or TSK, figuring high on the country’s agenda. “Yes, we are continuously on the agenda of Turkey, for this or that reason, rightfully or not,” he said. “I would not say the TSK being on the agenda is always because of unfair reasons. Of course, we are concerned with the Armed Forces always topping Turkey’s agenda because that has an impact on the TSK.”

“I cannot deny that impact. Then how will we look at that issue?” he added. “I will ask once ask: Do I make a mistake, as the armed forces? Then what falls on us is to minimize the mistakes being made at the TSK.”

The general, however, also complained that mistakes made by individuals from the armed forces are being attributed to the TSK itself.

“There is such a perception and we cannot prevent that. Our public cannot accept the emergence of people from the armed forces who make mistakes,” he said.

Başbuğ also criticized the way a question was asked in a survey following the reporting of an alleged assassination plot against Deputy Prime Minister Bülent Arınç. The question asked in the survey was “Have the assignation claims reduced your trust in the military?”

“This is the question that attributes it to the institution [the TSK]. That is the problem,” the general said. “The TSK could continuously be kept on the agenda, of course, if there are rightful reasons.”

Asked what concerns the military most, Başbuğ said the military is concerned with its occupying the agenda of the media. “I think it would be appropriate if everyone would pay attention,” he said. “I don’t say the TSK will never be on the agenda, but we have been very much on the agenda since October.”

Commenting on civil-military relations, the commander said it was not correct for the TSK to be involved in politics, but that it is also not correct to be making politics over the Armed Forces.

In response to a question about the alleged “Sledgehammer” coup plans, the top commander said it appears it will take a long time than expected for the prosecutor to examine the documents, which comprise thousands of pages.

“We all need to have patience,” he said. “We’ll wait till the investigation ends. Then everything will be understood.”

Başbuğ’s statements were welcomed by the members of the government. “I evaluate the statements of the top officer very positive and very human,” deputy Prime Minister Bülent Arınç told reporters Friday. Hüseyin Çelik, spokesperson of the Justice and Development Party, or AKP, said the statements were satisfactory.


 

23 Comments   Bookmark and Share  printer friendly PRINTER FRIENDLY

READER COMMENTS

Guest - Erden
2010-02-09 00:21:21
  David, Worse than hell? I think if you went to hell you would beg to be back in the Army!
 

Guest - mesut
2010-02-06 20:30:11
  ...it is very hard to understand the people who are supporting the headscarf banning in GATA or anywhere else in Turkey despite the fact that even the head of the arm says that it is indefensible.I wonder if those people who are supporting the headscarf ban would do the same if they were not allowed to public places with miniskirt?I agree that all people must obey the rules and regulations yet those rules must reflections of the public values otherwise it would become indefensible and ridicules as we here it from the head of the army...
 

Guest - David. S
2010-02-06 20:25:10
  This headscarf thing....again? A nation unable to get past such a trivial matter, or a nation that thinks it more than trivial, has a long way to go before solving truly demanding problems.
 

Guest - bk ny
2010-02-06 14:16:00
  To dilara-murat-veyis-and viggggo. Turkey is a Islam state for your imformation. Yous are obviously not muslims and not aware. So having a ban on headscarfs in any institution is not on understand.!!!
 

Guest - A resident
2010-02-06 14:01:14
  If this is sanity than I wonder the comment of royal service . What royal service, actually it is a humane action to allow a pious lady to visit a person in sick bed. If the ego of this type prevails the propounder of this hype will have to think twice when they are restricted from attending a dear one say in a western country on urgent basis and the entry visa imposed upon our country (because it is still immature and lagging in treating of its own citizens) does not allow him or her to do so. Turkey will have to reconsider again and again of similar farces. Whether in government or not one should have complete freedom to attend ones near and dear ones in distress or sick bed. Such ugly imposition makes us rather ridiculous than an advanced and developed society. As of the fact, it is not the victim that exposed the incident(which in my opinion is not at all trivial but of utmost importance) but it was an act of gaining undue popularity on part of an MP of an opposition party.
 

Guest - Fatih
2010-02-06 12:14:39
  I'll say it again since HDN yet again decided to block my posts. Hands OFF TSK!
 

Guest - Viggo
2010-02-06 08:30:00
  It is indeed quite remarkable that the PM announces in a suprised manner that his wife is not allowed to break the law. It shows a little about how he views both himself and the laws of this country. How can we expect regular people on the street to respect the law, if not even the PM and his wife follow them?
 

Guest - David
2010-02-06 07:50:23
  I must Admit, PKK gun-strapped militias do not bring dread to the heart of the TSK, but this little scarf thing can really inflame the passions of the Generals. What a silly, irrational fear they have of such a traditional and widespread worn cloth. I laugh at you.
 

Guest - Veyis Haydardedeoglu
2010-02-06 06:50:38
  Why should Erdogan's wife get exclusivity? There are costume rules for all which should apply to every individual irrespective of their standing whether it be it president’s wife or prime minister for that matter. Scarf, head- covers are outlawed in public institutions however allowed in the public. In reality, one should cover their inner soul and morality not their physical stature.
 

Guest - Suhaimi
2010-02-06 06:43:31
  Dear Dilara and Murat Agree that the issue is trivial. But the rule and law on head scarf is trivial in the first place. A primitive law which should be in the dustbin
 

Guest - Colleen
2010-02-06 03:31:10
  Its difficult for me, as an American woman, to understand why women who wear head scarves are denied equal rights and equal access. Here in the north east US, while there is sometimes prejudice against Muslims, by law a woman can wear a headscarf any place she wants. To me it looks like a human rights violation.
 

Guest - ali
2010-02-06 02:46:46
  yet another ploy by the AKP to drive a wedge into the heart of the military, SHAME,the arabs back stabbed us in WW1 in ataturk times, so then rightfully ataturk put a few rules in place , so now we have a PM with arab blood in his veins and all that means is big problems for turkey
 

Guest - Me
2010-02-06 01:46:04
  Once again bringing up the headscarf issue to shift the focus from more important issues. Whether you believe in the law or not, it is in place and even the PM's wife should have to abide by that law. She knew that is would be a problem and that is why she did it.
 

Guest - David Coors
2010-02-05 21:42:34
  I remember well my military service in Turkiye. Who can forget! It was like a true hell on Earth. Much worse than hell actually. I was under constant psychological and physical torture: beating, very bad and very little food, very bad or no hygiene, insults and obscene language, insults to my family members like mother, father and siblings, zero recreation, very bad sleeping quarters with no heating in near zero centigrade temprature or no ventilation in 50+ deg/centigrade (let alone air conditioning), busted pipes flooding the floors. TSK violated every word and merit of Geneva convention for POWs. Being a POW in communist Russia would be much better. This was under TSK, its pasha now talks about the importance of secularism and democracy for modern Turkey. Who the hell is he kidding?
 

Guest - Erden
2010-02-05 20:45:37
  Dilara, how stupid that you can refuse someone entry into a hospital just because of the clothing they wear, how can Turkey address alleged minority rights issues, when they can not even care for the majority? If a person were to wear a cross around their neck or a head scarf on their head, they should be allowed entry into any building!
 

Guest - Mr Goksel Doganay
2010-02-05 20:34:24
  Dilara and Murat the TSK is an institution of the state paid by the taxes of the people. What special treatment is the PM's wife is asking? Do you think denying access to any place due to their headscarf will diminish support for the AKP? These ill advice acts by certain segments reduce support for the TSK. A Turkish citizen will ask himself or herself where are my taxes going? I work 10 hours a day, I pay high rent and I travel to the end of the world to work and where is my tax going? Discrimination is unacceptable especially in the health services. So will hospitals deny medical care to individuals who are the enemy? This type of thinking is very abhorrent and does not belong in a 21st century modern secular republic. I'm sure better minds in North Korea exist. Even the TSK commander Basbug has commented that this incident should never have happened. So what are Earth are you defending? Do you defend discrimination? If headscarved women got together and boycotted sending their sons off to fight off the PKK who will protect you when you sleep Murat and Dilara?
 

Guest - The casual Observer
2010-02-05 20:23:09
  It seems like the PM's Islamikc zeal has no limits or no holds bared atitude. A mere incident at it's most, would have been subject of neighbourhood gossip, has been turned into subject of international entertainment and head shaking event.
 

Guest - MJ
2010-02-05 19:58:13
  Had Baykal's wife been denied entry into GATA because she doesn't wear a headscarf, you'd be up in arms Dilara and Murat. What hypocricy.
 

Guest - Fatih
2010-02-05 19:17:39
  hands off TSK!!!
 

Guest - sarastro
2010-02-05 19:08:26
  Does anyone think this was done innocently? It is right out of Karl Rove's playbook - take a special special case, make an example out of it, and then hammer repeatedly it to people who won't look so closely at the facts. If he wants to use his wife as a political pawn she loses her protected status and is fair game for attacks. She should be allowed NOWHERE where her scarf is a problem. It's time to start standing up to this Little Turkish Bush or Turkey will have the same suffering that you can see in the US now. I only hope that CHP is stronger than US Democrats.
 

Guest - Resident not Guest
2010-02-05 19:04:22
  If this is sanity than I wonder the comment of royal service . What royal service, actually it is a humane action to allow a pious lady to visit a person in sick bed. If the ego of this type prevails the propounder of this hype will have to think twice when they are restricted from attending a dear one say in a western country on urgent basis and the entry visa imposed upon our country (because it is still immature and lagging in treating of its own citizens) does not allow him or her to do so. Turkey will have to reconsider again and again of similar farces. Whether in government or not one should have complete freedom to attend ones near and dear ones in distress or sick bed. Such ugly imposition makes us rather ridiculous than an advanced and developed society. As of the fact, it is not the victim that exposed the incident(which in my opinion is not at all trivial but of utmost importance) but it was an act of gaining undue popularity on part of an irrisponsible MP of an opposition party. Still worst is the management of this crisis in parliament by the chairperson that day.
 

Guest - Murat
2010-02-05 19:00:25
  This did not need to happen. Whatever the rules are now, they are there now. It seems she instigated this on purpose. Hard to think otherwise.
 

Guest - Dilara
2010-02-05 16:44:48
  Completely insane that the PM thinks his wife has to get a special and royal service when he knows the rule very well. Being in the government , does not mean he and his family should be above the law. As usual he loves stressing on unnecessary trivial matters, when the country has more important matters to look into.
 

WRITE A COMMENT

Verification code
E-mail is required in case we need to communicate with you. It will not appear on the website and will never be used for any other purposes.
Comments policy: The Daily News seeks and supports freedom of expression and this commitment extends to our readers. Constraints include comments judged to be in violation of Turkish press law. We also moderate hate speech, libel and gratuitous insults.












Home | To Top | User Agreement and Privacy Policy | Rights and Permissions | Contact Us | Company | About News Room| RSS RSS Feed