LEADING NEWS SOURCE FOR TURKEY AND THE REGION

BURAK BEKDİL > A winning peace for all?

In his column yesterday, our editor-in-chief, Murat Yetkin, narrated how he celebrated the Nevruz of 1992: A policeman’s 9 mm Browning on his right temple during clashes in Nusaybin (The Nevruz threshold for Turkey’s future, Murat Yetkin, March 21, 2013). Six months before “the worst Nevruz ever experienced in Turkey,” in Murat’s words, I was in a more peaceful part of the world: Haringey, North London.

“Try the coffee shop on the corner,” the Turkish owner of a grocery shop pointed to what looked like a coffee shop, kebab restaurant, pub and every other business. I and a classmate were looking for a place in the “Turkish quarter” where we could watch a football game between the Crescent and Star squad and a European team.

We walked into the coffee chop which, other than being also a kebab house and a pub, was also a snooker parlor and a broadcaster of Turkish TV channels thanks to a satellite dish. The game had already kicked off and an enthusiastic crowd in one corner of the shop was watching excitedly. We barely found two seats right in the middle of the crowd, smiled at each other with satisfaction and concentrated on the game.

About 20 minutes into the first half I realized two things: All of the walls proudly boasted big PKK flags and a selection of Abdullah Öcalan posters; and some in the crowd had been distracted from the game and were watching these two young Turks. I subtly kicked Osman a few times but he was busy watching the game and did not want to be disturbed. I whispered to him: “Don’t even think of cheering if we score.” “What?” he said, “Are you crazy? We’ve driven 50 miles to cheer a goal!” I told him to discreetly look at the walls. He went pale. Later, we would learn that we had chosen the PKK’s locale to watch a game of the Crescent and Star.

I thought about sneaking out of the shop but we were in the middle of a pack of men, some of whom were examining our looks, which were in a state of excitement until a few moments ago. At that moment the Crescent and Star scored.

The next few minutes looked surreal. There was thundering applause and cheers, whistles of celebration mixed up with Kurdish slogans of which I only understood “Long live Turkey!” We were frozen. Until a Kurd in the PKK’s trademark khaki uniform tapped me on the shoulder and asked: “What’s wrong with you? Are you sorry that we scored?” We?! I was perplexed, still suspecting a trap. But a hundred Kurds could not have set the stage in the expectation that two silly Turks would show up for a nice beating.

At the end of the game, “we” won, but the scene after the final whistle was more surreal. We and our “PKK friends” were drinking Turkish lager to celebrate “our” victory. The shopkeeper gave us a good discount and, as we waved good-bye to our new friends, one of them said: “A war is a war, but this is about football. Come again, lads!”

On our way home, we did not speak for about an hour. “It was a good game,” I said. “I missed Turkish lager,” he said. “Maybe we should go there again.” We did. And it wasn’t about football only.

Seventeen years after that football game, I would write in this column: “Militaries always fight wars, symmetrical or asymmetrical; it’s their raison d’etre…Turkish fighter jets and attack helicopters and artillery can always bomb suspected PKK bases. Turkish soldiers can always exchange shots with the PKK units... There can always be casualties on either side. The Turkish military can lose one helicopter gunship or more, and can always buy new ones. New conscripts will always join the army; new recruits will always join the PKK. The PKK may metamorphose into a more political and less military structure. Or it may totally disappear from the scene; or give birth to new organizations inspired with the same romantic idea (A losing war for all, Feb. 27, 2008).”
Perhaps it’s time for a winning peace.

March/22/2013

Send to friend »

READER COMMENTS

Click for Hürriyet Daily News comment guidelines

Euphrates Rising

4/11/2013 9:16:48 PM

Ismail - You're absolutely right Ismail. The Turks are the master race and they are ordained by God to rule over the peoples of the middle east. May I be free of this "discussion" now?

ismail demir

3/27/2013 3:22:16 PM

Kurd-iran conflict started earlier than Turk-iranian war.Turks have no responsibility for Kurdish deportation in iran.Therefore they have not responsibility to give any concession.No European country would allow Kurdish immigrants autonomy because they had to leave their native land due to persecution.Kurds should demand rights from iran, rather than being ungratefull to Turks by teror.It is ridicolous to blame host country house refugees for refuees misfortune at their native land.

ismail demir

3/27/2013 3:09:49 PM

Kurds were not native of the all the Mesopotamia, they just settled %5 of Turkey 150 years earlier, as I said.And Kurds had not autonomy, Kurdish tribes were ruled by governers appointed by Ottoman King.Autonomous places were not ruled central appointed governers.For instance Crimea was autonomous, and King had not appoint there anybody but King appointed governer of Diyarbakir and Van.Official schools education language was Turkish even kurdish populated areas at Ottoman times.

Euphrates Rising

3/26/2013 5:13:07 PM

@Ismail-Fine, we established that Kurds are natives of mesopotamia.We can also agree that Kurds aligned themselves with Ottomans in 16th century. But to take the leap and say that modern Turkish state is modeled after that alliance is a distortion.Kurds had a status within Ottoman rule which recognized Kurdish language, culture and autonomy.Are you arguing once consent is given it is always a consent?What about forced migrations of Kurds? Are Kurds to blame for that as well?

ismail demir

3/25/2013 9:16:37 PM

Helene, simple chronology 1-Kurds were just living at Zagros mountains (region between iran-Iraq) until Islamic invasion at 7. century,2-Kurds had settled Assyrian , Armenian and Arab populated lands in the Southeast Anatolia at 10. century and found Merwani State that covers Diyarbakir-Mardin-Hakkari triangle (not covers Urfa,Dersim or Van) they had been living %5 of todays Turkey prior to 1071. 3-Turks settled Anatolia after 1071 not 12.-13. century as you claimed revisionism.

Euphrates Rising

3/25/2013 5:03:08 PM

@Ismail - Also, can you answer which cities are the 5% belonging to the Kurds? Diyarbakir?Sirnak?Batman?Dersim? Siirt? Van? Hakkari? Mardin? Urfa? Bingol? Mus? The southeast of Turkey covers roughly 1/3 of the land mass. Details, I know.

Euphrates Rising

3/25/2013 4:55:15 PM

@Ismail demir - I won't bother to comment on your imaginary numbers. But let me ask you a question. We know that the Turkic nomads started trickling in to middle east from central asia in the 12th and 13th century. Did you ever wonder -- according to your revisionist histories -- did the Kurds just appear in the Middle East in the 16th century at the Battle of Chaldiran? Very convenient. Very magical.

ismail demir

3/23/2013 4:39:43 AM

Helene, Kurds are not founder partner of Turkey, and they are first nation only about %5 of Turkey.Kurds demand Turks living Kurdish majority cities to learn Kurdish similar to Basque model unlike your claim.Majority of the Kurds are akin to Turks in Germany since they came to Anatolia by accepting there as a Turkish land at 16. century.Turks have right to defend their culture as Germans.If Kurds have problem with using Turkish language they should left Turkey with their %5 of native land.

Euphrates Rising

3/22/2013 11:24:33 PM

It's strange @Murat - why would you say that Kurds have a nationalism problem akin to Turks? Kurds have not dictated that Turkey's official language be solely Kurdish and the country be called Kurdistan and that Kurdish be taught to Turkish speaking children. You are confusing the Kurds demand for equal rights for ethnic nationalism. The Kurds are not akin to Turks who immigrated to Germany. Kurds are a 'first nation' or founding partners of the modern Turkish state.

Turkish Sal

3/22/2013 9:09:56 PM

I'm not really a fan of Burak's anti-everything-remotely-close-to-Islam rhetoric but I must say that this piece has evoked s lot of emotion. Especially the reading the last paragraph and last sentence nearly brought me to tears. Call me a softy:)"Perhaps it’s time for a winning peace."
< >

WRITE COMMENT

MOST POPULAR

AcerPro S.I.P.A HTML & CSS Agency