LEADING NEWS SOURCE FOR TURKEY AND THE REGION

MUSTAFA AKYOL > Yet more bad news for Turkish press

Last weekend, unexpected news hit Turkey’s headlines: The top executives of Taraf, an ultra-liberal daily that has fearlessly bashed both the old Kemalist establishment and the new AKP government, resigned. Ahmet Altan, the editor-in-chief of the paper, along with Yasemin Çongar, the second to Altan in rank, announced their departure. Soon, they were also followed by Neşe Düzel, a senior correspondent, and Murat Belge, a senior columnist.

To see why this is more than just any ordinary job change in the Turkish media, we should take a closer look at Taraf. This paper was established only five years ago by Altan, Çongar and a bunch of idealist liberals and leftists with a self-declared mission: helping Turkey’s democratic transformation by relentlessly going after the powers that be. In those initial years, Taraf especially defied the Turkish military, with a bravado that shocked most Turks, who had seen this sinister institution as untouchable.

Taraf also became very instrumental in the Ergenekon and Sledgehammer cases, which both put alleged coup plots on trial. Many of the documents that were used by the prosecutors in these cases were first printed in Taraf – before they were apparently “leaked” to the paper by the police.

During this initial period, which probably went on until 2011, Taraf was very popular among pro-AKP conservatives as well. But as the military’s power waned, and the AKP government consolidated itself, Taraf’s arrows turned toward the “new establishment.” Especially Prime Minister Tayyip Erdoğan became the paper’s new target, as its headlines and editorials began to bash him every day as the new threat to freedom.

If you ask me, I think Taraf was basically right in its stances, but also often too emotional, clumsy and subjective. In the “coup cases,” Taraf overlooked the excesses of the prosecution, such as prolonged arrests of too many suspects, and also dismissed some the legitimate suspicions about the military documents that it published. With regards to the AKP, Taraf again was too heated in my view, as not only the authoritarian stances of the AKP but also its legitimate moral conservatism became the paper’s target. (No wonder even some Taraf writers, such as Yıldıray Oğur, disagreed with Altan on the latter’s passionate anti-AKP stance.)

All in all, however, Taraf has certainly been an important contribution to Turkish democracy. Its opinion pages broke many taboos, ranging from Atatürk’s historical reality to the true fate of Ottoman Armenians. Moreover, in its five-year-long short history, it proved to be an independent paper that bowed to no one.

Therefore, the departure of Altan and the other leading names of the paper is concerning. The announced reason is that the paper is in a dire economic situation, and that Altan and others have become “tired and frustrated.” In his farewell column, Altan wrote that he is going back to his “real job,” which is writing novels. We will see what the others will do, and what Taraf will do without them, in the months to come.

Nevertheless, many people inevitably suspect that pressure from the AKP government might have led the owner of Taraf, Başar Aslan, to ask for the withdrawal of his most anti-AKP pens. I have no evidence to support or dismiss this claim, but I am sure that it will be credible for many. And I am also sure that the earthquake in Taraf will be yet another bad sign for the future of independent journalism in Turkey.

December/19/2012

Send to friend »

READER COMMENTS

Click for Hürriyet Daily News comment guidelines

Kevin Snapp

12/19/2012 11:28:09 PM

In the US, it is common for publications expressing controversial opinions to be supported by donations as well as subscriptions and advertising. Was there an attempt to support Taraf through donations? If not, since the publisher knew Taraf would publish what many did not want to hear and would attract limited advertising, it suggests a non-economic motive, perhaps pressure on the publisher.

Agnes Smith

12/19/2012 7:32:30 PM

@ Can Oz. Watch that space. Mustafa you can run but you cannot hide. Your dream of liberal islam which in fact is what you already had is being swept away day by day.

Hasan Kutlay

12/19/2012 7:23:12 PM

Liberals like Altan & co have been used by the AKP. They were good as long as they harshly criticized AKP'opponents and not the AKP. It's funny that Turkey is by some praised as a "democratic model for the Arab world". Besides free and fair elections, there's nothing democratic about Turkey. Time to face the facts.

Deniz Can

12/19/2012 7:20:16 PM

PART1Mr. AKYOL I have stopped reading your column as source of objectivity about Turkey. I have long recognised that you’re biased. If the subject is the National Kemalism your the bravest person to attack again and aging. If the subject National-Kemalism versus AKP's single-minded autocratic leadership style, which has been transforming Turkey into possessed and monopolised political system by taking everyone, who is not agreed with it, into refuge, you are silencing: “no enough evidence”

Deniz Can

12/19/2012 7:19:55 PM

PART2 Your romantic approach in your column is showing your strong ideological sympathy with the AKP. If you want to reflect your sympathy and solidarity for the journalists, who are not the first scarifies, will not be the last ones, is not enough to prevent the AKP. Keep in mind; the way Kemalism created its own ideological enemy, the AKP is creating its own ideological enemy, which may silence you this time in the future, because these types of ideologies have been working on this principles

Can Oz

12/19/2012 5:43:46 PM

If the secularists were still in charge, Akyol would have been much critical and harsh about government censorship of the press (remember the column "What if Ataturk never dictated?"). I guess Akyol prefers sunni fascism over secularist fascism. Proof me wrong Akyol, and have the courage the admit that AKP duped Turkish liberals from the beginning.

mara mcglothin

12/19/2012 4:01:20 PM

AMEER I simply do not believe that a bit of Islam mixed in with any government is a good thing! There must be a separation between the church and the state. Simple. I have no ill will toward the religion or this columnist. If I agree with MR AKYOL I am the first to admit it. How many times exactly have you praised the writings of MR BEKDIL, just for the record?????

Ameer Raschid

12/19/2012 3:06:31 PM

@maramcglothın. Not able to express approval as a Bekdil groupie,she resorts to her faultıng hım for being surprised (where ?) at the restrictions on journalistic freedom. Compliments showered on bekdil every chance and not even a grudgingly comment of agreement because of her anti-AKP/islamic and secular mindset.

Agnes Smith

12/19/2012 11:56:52 AM

B Medic - maybe advertisers have been warned and this is why the paper has gone into submission. They can't put the price up to compensate as it will affect sales and readership. I for one hate Turkish papers due to the overload of ads and no real news. They are a waste of paper they are printed on. Mostly men buy them for the boobs and football. How many women do you see buying a paper? Indeed this is a sad day for Turkish journalism and another success for AKPs control over freedom of speech.

edward rooking

12/19/2012 11:36:20 AM

Voila! The blessings of the new Islamist Turkey.
< >

WRITE COMMENT

MOST POPULAR

AcerPro S.I.P.A HTML & CSS Agency