EMRE DELİVELİ >Saving Private Savings II

Print Page Send to friend »

At $6 billion, the January current account deficit came in higher than market expectations of $5.5 billion, not to mention Economy Minister Zafer Çağlayan’s optimistic $4 billion projection. According to Sabah, this would make Çağlayan a “karavanacı” (someone who completely misses the target), as the Turkish daily has called economists whose forecasts have been off.

High oil prices are definitely taking their toll on the current account, but even the non-energy deficit is not adjusting as quickly as expected. As anyone who skims Turkish dailies would know, a high deficit is a risk because it makes the country dependent on foreign financing, basically subjecting it to the whims of global risk appetite. An economy where the Central Bank governor spends more time worrying about the Fed and ECB than domestic developments is not healthy by any means.

Argentinean economist Guillermo Calvo is reported to have jokingly said that “we don’t know much about economics other than accounting identities”. The national income accounting identity dictates that the current account is (more or less) equal to the sum of public and private savings investment balances. As an emerging market, Turkey needs to invest a lot to grow. But its savings rate, currently around 12 percent, is very low as well, which can easily be seen in international comparisons.

Moreover, savings have been falling since the end of the last millennium. While public sector profligacy was behind the decline before the 2001 crisis, the fall in savings over the last decade has mainly been a private sector phenomenon, as the government started running a tight fiscal ship as part of the crisis recovery program.

Ina new study, which was released in Istanbul and Ankara last week, World Bank economists go a step further by showing that the savings shortfall was due to the plunge in household savings, as corporate savings actually increased, at least until the 2008-2009 global crisis.

They attribute lower household savings mainly to the “decline in macroeconomic vulnerabilities”: The increased availability of credit, fall in interest rates and postponed consumption more than offset the increase in savings that would be associated with rising incomes. There was also less need for precautionary savings as the economy normalized. 

The decline in woman’s labor force participation might have played a role as well, as
an earlier World Bank study has found that households in which women work tend to save even beyond the additional income effect. It seems working not only saves lives for women, as I was arguing last week, but it also saves private savings!

These results are in line with earlier findings, which I had referred to when
I first addressed the Turkish savings problem more than two years ago. Economists Murat Üçer and Caroline Van Rijckeghem have attributed the decline in savings to the post-crisis credit growth and the rise in housing prices, whereas research from Yapı Kredi has pointed to the increase in middle classes’ share of consumption.

But the real question is how to increase private savings. This is where I will pick up next week, when I will conclude my savings trilogy.


PRINTER FRIENDLY Send to friend »



AcerProS.I.P.A HTML & CSS Agency