LEADING NEWS SOURCE FOR TURKEY AND THE REGION

POLITICS > Nationalist leader Bahçeli: Kirkuk will remain ‘Turkish’ forever

ANKARA

Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) leader Devlet Bahçeli speaks at parliamentary group meeting. DAILY NEWS photo / Selahattin SÖNMEZ

Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) leader Devlet Bahçeli speaks at parliamentary group meeting. DAILY NEWS photo / Selahattin SÖNMEZ

The Turkish government has abandoned the Turkmen minority in Kirkuk for the sake of energy deals with Iraq’s Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG), but the city will remain Turkish forever, Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) leader Devlet Bahçeli said today.

While noting that the Turkish government’s relations with the Iraqi Kurdish administration had improved in recent years, Bahçeli accused “the Peshmarga administration” of conducting secret operations against Turkmen people and called on the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) to take rapid action in order to protect Turkmens’ rights.

“Kirkuk is Turkish and will remain Turkish forever,” Bahçeli said during his parliamentary group meeting. “Kirkuk is love, passion to us,” Bahçeli said, adding that he considered Kirkuk to be no different than Istanbul and Ankara.

Bahçeli also extended condolences to Turkmens following a recent coordinated attack on Kirkuk’s police headquarters – a suicide car bomb followed by an assault by grenade-throwing gunmen – that killed 30 people and wounded 88 others.

Recalling messages of solidarity given to Turkmens by Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu during an August 2012 visit to Kirkuk, the MHP leader said the AKP government had failed to display this solidarity in practice. Instead, the government has been “inconsistent, insincere and exploitative,” he said.

He also suggested that the energy deals signed by the Turkish government and the Iraqi Kurdish administration have turned into an issue of priority for the AKP instead of the situation of the Turkmens.

Kirkuk, a multiethnic city of Arabs, Kurds and Turkmen 240 kilometers north of Baghdad, lies at the heart of a dispute between Iraq’s central government and the autonomous Kurdistan region.

February/05/2013

Send to friend »

READER COMMENTS

Click for Hürriyet Daily News comment guidelines

imad saqi

2/6/2013 4:32:37 PM

Yes you are right Turkmen population was fallen in Kirkuk after Saddam Brought the Arabs and gave them Turkmen Lands to build uppon. Also in Saddam Time the Turkmen were not allowed to register as a Turkmen in General Census they were either to register as Arabs or Kurds. After fallen of Saddam Kirkuk populations was increased from 800,000 to 1.5 million with in ayear of Saddam been fallen, all the increased i.e around 700,000 were from the Kurds who were not orinaly all from Kirkuk Area.

world citizen

2/5/2013 10:03:24 PM

To respond to the claims about: no such thing as "Kurdistan", I strongly suggest people to open their eyes and see the reality on the ground. Denying their existence doesn't change the reality. Kurdistan exists, named today KRG but it will change. I am all for Turkish success but this dishonesty about kurds existence and rights is simnply outrageous and has no place in the civilized world.

world citizen

2/5/2013 9:57:33 PM

The past is the past and the present is the present. Yes Kirkuk was claimed during WW1 by Turks because there was an almost equal Turkish and Kurdish population there. The Turks were brought by the Ottomans soldiers, the Kurds were already here before. It's a fact not a fairytale. Also today the city has a slight majority of kurds. Turkmen are less than 1/3... Why this nationalistic non-sense?

imad saqi

2/5/2013 7:40:27 PM

IF look at the names of all the seven Big Gates of Kalaa ( the old castle of Kirkuk) , old quarters , bazars, graves yards, and districts, hamams and mehallas of Kirkuk you find that all of them have Turkish names. All old grave stones are engraved with old turkish poems. Kirkuk is the Land of Selguks, Attabeks, and moreover another Three empires all rulled in Kirkuk. Mosel areas was rulled by Ak Kuyunlu and Kara Kuyunlu. Let not forget Turkmen were in in Iraq Abbasians Time.

mara mcglothin

2/5/2013 6:34:51 PM

DANIEL Shoulda woulda coulda. It didn't happen, so we are not dealing with what happened then, we are dealing with today. What would you suggest. Should Turkey take Kirkuk back? With everything going on in Turkey today, doesn't he have far more pressing issues than this?

Murat

2/5/2013 6:23:35 PM

Nonsense.

Turdistan

2/5/2013 4:34:44 PM

He is right, it is disgraceful that we leave our Turkmen brethren to rot amongst the disfunctional Kurdish administration.

Butterworth Stavely

2/5/2013 4:32:04 PM

@Rran & Mara; Read some history. Following WW1 The Kirkuk area was supposed to remain as part of modern Turkey but due to machinations by the Brits to retain oil producing areas, it was not ceded back to the Turkish area as agreed. I am not a supporter of any Turkish party and have no dog in this fight but Mr. Bahceli's remarks aren't so far fetched as you might think.

mara mcglothin

2/5/2013 3:26:04 PM

And we wonder why AKP gets reelected. Here is a perfect example of one alternative?

Lovable Dude

2/5/2013 2:06:00 PM

WHOOOO talks like this ????? Dose this man being realistic or dose he live in a Fairytale Land ???? Bahçeli: I don't know if you being serious or making a joke of yourself ?? Kirkuk belongs to Kurdistan and always stays Kurdistani with our Torkamani brothers in it !! MHP is a Joke and thank God that AKP is running thing and not MHP
< >

WRITE COMMENT

MOST POPULAR

AcerPro S.I.P.A HTML & CSS Agency