TURKEY
• DIPLOMACY
Thursday, September 09 2010 10:44 GMT+2
Your time is 
 

US Armenians step up 'genocide recognition' campaign ahead of Erdoğan visit

Font Size: Larger|Smaller
Ümit Enginsoy
The largest and most radical US Armenian group has stepped up its efforts to 'educate' US administration leaders and lawmakers about Washington's formal recognition of what they call the Armenian genocide. The group's statement comes days before Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is set visit the United States for talks with US President Barack Obama

The largest and most radical U.S. Armenian group has stepped up its efforts to “educate” U.S. administration leaders and lawmakers about Washington’s formal recognition of what they call the Armenian genocide.

The group’s statement comes days before Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is set to visit the United States for talks with U.S. President Barack Obama.

Erdoğan and Obama are scheduled to meet at the White House on Dec. 7 as part of the Turkish prime minister’s first visit to Washington since the new U.S. president took office in January.

The Armenian National Committee of America, or ANCA, has been leading what it calls an education campaign ahead of Erdoğan’s trip. In response to ANCA’s call, thousands of U.S. Armenians have contacted the White House and Congressional representatives in recent days, urging them to work for the U.S. recognition of World War I-era killings of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire as genocide.

The U.S. Armenians are also sending messages to leading media organizations in support of their cause as part of the campaign ANCA has dubbed the “countdown to Erdoğan.”

“Countdown to Erdoğan is a four-week, grassroots campaign urging President Obama to speak truthfully about the Armenian genocide when he meets Dec. 7 with Turkey’s Prime Minister Erdoğan,” ANCA recently said in a written statement.

Currently, two genocide-recognition resolutions, backed by pro-Armenian lawmakers, are pending in the House of Representatives and the Senate.

 Reconciliation process

U.S. Armenians are pushing for the resolutions’ passage despite an ongoing effort by Turkey and Armenia to normalize relations between the two countries.

The Turkish and Armenian foreign ministers signed a set of agreements Oct. 10 under which Ankara and Yerevan would set up normal diplomatic relations and reopen their land border. The deal, if ratified by the parliaments of the two neighbors, would effectively end decades of hostile relations.

U.S. Armenians are solely focusing on the objective of winning formal U.S. recognition of the last century’s killings as genocide. During last year’s election campaign, Obama pledged to back the U.S. Armenian cause if elected president.

During his presidency, however, Obama has fully backed the Ankara-Yerevan reconciliation process and abstained from actions that would jeopardize it.

The normalization process will be one of the top issues discussed by Obama and Erdoğan on Dec. 7, officials from both countries say.


 

40 Comments   Bookmark and Share  printer friendly PRINTER FRIENDLY

READER COMMENTS

Guest - vural korkmaz
2010-01-13 09:41:42
  Emir Soler says "If Armenians are sure of genocide, why don’t they take Turkey to court?" They cannot, because all Armenian claims are fabricated without any truth. Basically Armenians are BSing.
 

Guest - George
2009-12-07 22:48:05
  Prof. McCarthy of the University of Louisville, Prof. Bernard Lewis of Princeton, and Prof. Sandford Shaw of the University of California at Los Angeles -- these men are all in the pay of the Turkish Government in one way or other. So they are only stating what they are told for the $$$$$ they get. The word genocide was not in use until the 40's, but enough independent on site observers have stated a 'Genocide' occurred. And why would you go to jail for making that statement ? afraid of the truth ?
 

Guest - Emir Soler
2009-12-05 23:30:00
  That is the law of the jungle. Here is more facts: 1988, there are eyewitness accounts of Russian soldiers, demographic evidence, reports from Allied soldiers, photographic evidence, as well as testimonies from the Turkish refugees. Seventy American scholars -- including Prof. McCarthy of the University of Louisville, Prof. Bernard Lewis of Princeton, and Prof. Sandford Shaw of the University of California at Los Angeles -- testified in 1988 in front of the House International Committee that there was no genocide of Armenians. The Clinton Administration continues to back the Turkish people on this issue, because it knows the truth: there was no Armenian genocide.
 

Guest - Peder
2009-12-05 21:39:14
  i have read most of the comment .they are understandability divided by nationality Turks can deny this as much as they want but they know this happened they just don't have the courage to stand up and speak the truth.i just want to comment To EMIR SOLER. Turks denied the truth for so long they think if they speak the truth now they will look silly You know what in my view They will look DISSENT. Wake up Turkey Nobody believes you anymore time to admit the TRUTH..World community has no patients left...
 

Guest - Lilit
2009-12-05 09:27:27
  Emir, the greatest court trial ever that would prove the fact of the Armenian Genocide is the one that claimed the assassin of Taleat Pasha innocent. His name is Soghomon Tehlerian. Go ahead, browse the Internet and READ MORE!!!
 

Guest - James
2009-12-05 07:20:06
  Why does a purported journalistic organizaton, which is supposed to uphold truth and objectivity, continue to regurgitate Turkish governmental anti-Armenic propaganda? If Hurriyet wishes to be taken seriously as a news organization it must turn away from the Turkish governments genocide denial and join the Western community in speaking out against it. Unless of course you are monitored by the supposably "democractic" Turkish government? Of course though, because this won't be published, my point will be proven.
 

Guest - Don Moradian
2009-12-05 06:16:59
  Let me make sure I understand the vast majority of these comments. I have visited Istanbul and met some wonderful people. My grandparents came from Moosh and Bitlis in Anatolia and you are telling me that the horror they described of the mass unprovoked murder and rape were all lies.. By the way, they left in1899 and witnessed this because they saw what was coming. As my great grandfather said, "Christianity will never survive here!". They fled to America. There are books written, and one in 1896 (and I possess a copy in my library), 19 years before the great massacre of 1915 titled 'Armenian Massacres Or The Sword Of Mohammed'' written by Frederick Davis Greene,M.A., Secretary of the National Relief Committee. It was entered into the Library of Congress in 1896. You want to believe that and other books, and the stories my grand parents and great aunts and uncles seldom spoke of with a hollow horror upon their faces were all lies. "Forgive them father, for they know not what they do!" The truth shall set you free. Only then can we move forward. Don Moradian
 

Guest - dannn
2009-12-02 22:00:27
  @truth:Yeah accepted cause of documents don't kid your self most accepted purely cause they have a huge Armenian population.
 

Guest - Emir Soler
2009-12-02 19:59:21
  If Armenians are sure of genocide, why don’t they take Turkey to court?_ They won’t because they haven’t got a leg to stand on, Always easy to bribe politicians, and get support around the World. I AM CALLING ALL ARMENIANS TO TAKE TURKEY TO COURT FOR 1915-1916 GENOCIDE WHICH YOU FALSLY CLAIM You won’t, because you’re false accusation of genocide will come out in court. and you will look silly.
 

Guest - Bored
2009-12-02 17:20:24
  it looks like Hurriyet Daily News has started to block my messages , shame especially when they were not even controversial...does this newspaper and Turkey no favours doing this..
 

Guest - Ergun
2009-12-02 16:23:22
  Taran my friend... at last we are communicating intelligently. Your explanation of why the Armenians in Istanbul were not killed, (because Istanbul was not Armenian land) but in eastern anatolia the Armenians were killed because they had land claims, is a logical one . In fact you "hit the nail on the head with a hammer". However you are proving the point that, what happened during those times can be characterized as a massacre but not genocide. The Legal definition of genocide is ..."genocide is the mass killing of a group of people, not for what they have done, but for who they are".There has to be intent to annihilate the whole population. So, when those in Istanbul, were not molested, then causal reason as to the killing of the others is the rebellion. Thus it is not genocide. When the Americans dropped 2 atomoic bombs on Japan, that was legally speaking a massacre. It was not genocide because the INTENT of the Americans was to make Japan surrender, and not to kill all of the Japanese people. I would apreciate a response from you. Best regards, and lets be friends. Ergun
 

Guest - James
2009-12-02 16:01:22
  @Alex......TRUTH correctly points out the mountain of eyewitness evidence pointing towards genocide. Why is it so hard for Turkey to accept this? How long can Turkey hold on to Armenian lands and forgo compensation to the descendants of the Ottoman Armenian population? Do you expect this to go on forever?
 

Guest - ALEX
2009-12-02 13:59:20
  Truth, your comments does not add to confirmation. The hilter comment is propaganda and a good sound bite to try to make the issue broader. I really do not understand why Turkey and Armenians can not take it from here on in. If both countries talk to each other then what the Americans and others think becomes void. Let's face it the ANCA and similar groups will slowly becoming obsolete. This matter can only be solved one way and everyone should support this solution. The time is coming to an end when fiction becomes reality. The ANCA should disband and get behind & fully support the Armenian & Turkish governmental talks.
 

Guest - TRUTH
2009-12-02 07:55:17
  SOME OF THE FACTS ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE. TO ALL THOSE HAVE THEIR DOUBTS: The Armenian Genocide was condemned at the time by representatives of the British, French, Russian, German, and Austrian governments—namely all the major Powers. The first three were foes of the Ottoman Empire, the latter two, allies of the Ottoman Empire. The United States, neutral towards the Ottoman Empire, also condemned the Armenian Genocide and was the chief spokesman in behalf of the Armenians. Despite Turkish denial, there is no doubt about the Armenian Genocide. For example, German ambassador Count von Wolff-Metternich, Turkey's ally in World War I, wrote his government in 1916 saying: "The Committee [of Union and Progress] demands the annihilation of the last remnants of the Armenians and the [Ottoman] government must bow to its demands." German consuls stationed in Turkey, including Vice Consul Max Erwin von Scheubner-Richner of Erzerum [Erzurum] who was Adolf Hitler's chief political advisor in the 1920s, were eyewitnesses. Hitler said to his generals on the eve of sending his Death's Heads units into Poland, "Go, kill without mercy . . . who today remembers the annihilation of the Armenians." Henry Morgenthau Sr., the neutral American ambassador to the Ottoman Empire, sent a cable to the U.S. State Department in 1915: "Deportation of and excesses against peaceful Armenians is increasing and from harrowing reports of eye witnesses [sic] it appears that a campaign of race extermination is in progress under a pretext of reprisal against rebellion." Morgenthau's successor as Ambassador to Turkey, Abram Elkus, cabled the U.S. State Department in 1916 that the Young Turks were continuing an ". . . unchecked policy of extermination through starvation, exhaustion, and brutality of treatment hardly surpassed even in Turkish history." Only one Turkish government, that of Damad Ferit Pasha, has ever recognized the Armenian genocide. In fact, that Turkish government held war crimes trials and condemned to death the major leaders responsible. The Turkish court concluded that the leaders of the Young Turk government were guilty of murder. "This fact has been proven and verified." It maintained that the genocidal scheme was carried out with as much secrecy as possible. That a public facade was maintained of "relocating" the Armenians. That they carried out the killing by a secret network. That the decision to eradicate the Armenians was not a hasty decision, but "the result of extensive and profound deliberations." Ismail Enver Pasha, Ahmed Cemal Pasha, Mehmed Talât Bey, and a host of others were convicted by the Turkish court and condemned to death for "the extermination and destruction of the Armenians."
 

Guest - enough BS
2009-12-02 06:08:30
  enough of the armenians stateing that it is a unequivocal fact. u want the facts then try and go to the armenian archives and see if u can access the records. it is impossible to acsess them. where as in turkey anyone can access them freely. another fact is that most of the countries that recognize the events durring 1915 as genocide have themselves committed genocide but do not accept it. turkey is not running from the truth it has said, put ur evidence on the table and so will we. what have the armenians done? nothing but make excuses as to why it wouldnt work. i find that very strange. u have a opportunity to finally get what u have been after for almost a century and now u try and block a commission into establishing the truth. turkey has gone on the record in front of the world and said it will accept the result of this commission. u know why the armenians dont want this commission. its because the vast majority of evidence that is available is compiled from the allies war propaganda and will easily be dismissed in any court of law. it also means that armenia will have to present the records it has locked away and it doesnt want anyone to see.
 

Guest - Ergun
2009-12-01 20:54:46
  Taron....contunuing on, you say there are about 20 countries that have recognized this so called Armenian genocide. What you should be seeing in this, is thjat those respective 20 countries, have sizeable armenian populations within each country. These Armenian populations are big enough to influence the vote at every level of government. And the most important aspect of this , these are the very same Armenians and their descendants who are supposed to have been killed in Turkey. Give me a break.... Your ancestors have been fooling you and you have been fooling the world. THERE IS NO PROOF AND THERE WILL NEVER BE ANY PROOF that Armenian genocide ever happened. What happened is that about half a million Armenians and about 2 million turks and kurds were killed during the Armenian rebellion of 1915. Respectfully , Ergun
 

Guest - Taron
2009-12-01 20:20:27
  Ergun, I shall tell you why the Turks did not touch the Armenians of Istanbul. This is because Istanbul is not Armenian land. The Armenians of Anatolia were deported because they could claim those historic Armenian lands, which in its turn posed a major threat to the very existence and future of Turkey and Turks. Try to read something else, only nationalistic propaganda is not helpful to find any positive solution.
 

Guest - Ergun
2009-12-01 20:12:44
  Taron.... you did not even come close to answering any one of my 3 question. They are fair questions. Instead what you are saying amounts to demagoguery. I think the Armenian peoples should stop poisoning the minds of their own peaople with untrue allegetions. And that is the biggest tragedy of all in this sad episode in history. Respectfully, Ergun
 

Guest - Taron
2009-12-01 19:57:17
  Ergun, I shall tell you why the Turks did not touch the Armenians of Istanbul. This is because Istanbul is not Armenian land. The Armenians of Anatolia were deported because they could claim those historic Armenian lands, which in its turn posed a major threat to the very existence and future of Turkey and Turks. Try to read something else, only nationalistic propaganda is not helpful to find any positive solution.
 

Guest - Taron
2009-12-01 19:43:17
  Besides, it is very characteristic for former empires to look back to their history with glory and pride, and to not consider every aspect of history that portraits the former empire in a negative way. So for Turks, who have been injected with : "we have a glorious and proud history", it is very offensive to be accused of something like a genocide. This is something that touches upon the pride of the former empire, it is not prestigious.
 

Guest - Taron
2009-12-01 19:19:54
  Ergun, Over 20 countries have recognized the Turkish genocide of the Armenians as an indisputable fact and the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) have stated without reservation that the Armenians were subject to genocide. Scores of renown historians agree it was genocide and the International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ), commission by the Turkish Armenian Reconciliation Commission (TARC), in their study concluded the Armenians were subject to genocide. I don't mind if the Armenian Diaspora or the Armenian state bring the issue to every possible institution, but what possible outcome could the result of this institutions be, other than a reiteration of what is an accepted fact?
 

Guest - Mariner
2009-12-01 17:17:09
  Why cannot Armenian and Turkish Historians/Scientists form a commitee and open all their national archives? This commitee can cooperate and uncover the truth using science and history. If Armenian claims are righteous about systematic killings and genocide, ARCA and Armenian State can surely agree to this. If this commitee proves that Armenian claims are indeed righteous, America and all the rest of the world can recognize the Armenian Genocide and whatever the consequences are Turkish people shall take on. If not, ARCA and other Armenian anti-turkish propaganda shall be stopped. How about this?
 

Guest - Ergun
2009-12-01 16:39:51
  Three questions: 1. Why haven't the Armenians gone to a Court of Law to resolve their cause? Is it because they have NO evidence? In the political arena yoi can a say any lie and keep repeating it until some people beleive it, and then you start repeating it even more furiously, and point out that there is alrady some beleivers and keep repeating the cycle. 2. Why would the Ottomans re-locate the Armenians to other Ottoman lands like Beirut and Damascus, and so on... if they really wanted to kill them? ( Didn't Hitler do the opposite to the jewish people) 3. Why did the Ottomans not touch the 100,000 Armenians in Istanbul, the capital.? This does not reconcile with the definition of genocide- which is to kill a group of people because of who they are as opposed to what they did. Isn't this proof that the Ottomans did not commit genocide. Reasonable people would think that what happened in eastern Anatolia was because of a rebellion, and nothing more. Respectfully Ergun.
 

Guest - 7 Hills
2009-12-01 16:35:47
  The rest of the world wants to know the TRUTH! It is sad that people with money are hiding the truth, changing the facts to look like victims.. and yes.. at this point this could be true of either side. Yes it looks like some were traitors and the other group dealt with the traitors during the war. So who is right.. maybe they are both right and the rest of the world should tell both groups to take their money and go lobby eachother to get the truth out and deal with it.. This is so freaking boring.. The US has more important things to worry about than this BS.. And I don't blame any world leader to make any statements until both side are willing to let the REAL truth out. Until then, let's have some lobbying for the truth... not a bunch of BS and whining.
 

Guest - Ergun
2009-12-01 16:30:08
  I have 3 questions that merit a realistic answer: 1. Why haven't the Armenian diaspora gone to "court of law".
 

Guest - Hairenakitz
2009-12-01 16:03:26
  Turkey must face its brutal history ONCE & FOR ALL.
 

Guest - ALEX
2009-12-01 15:45:29
  To Truth: I understand that 20 countries have past a bill of recognition . I think that you will find that most of these countries certainly have an agenda, be it that they have a large Armenian migrant population or that it was a way to get politicians votes. Do you really think that if such an event is recognized in the US then some how by a miracle everything is then solved. The problem that I have it very basic. Lets say the Americans with all there wisdom agree that this terrible is indeed a genocide, then what? Do you want Van? No you want compensation. The problem is that most of the people who write on this site are Armenians leaving outside their country, and few of you want a lasting solution. After many years of having the single voice you now have a fight on level terms. Tell me, Argentina, a country with a wonderful domestic record is one of the 20 countries that recognizes this event. What does the average Argentinian know about what happened in empire during that time. What bearing does this really have on anything? As you most probably know the country is not exactly what one would call exemplary. I would find it an embarrassment. Maybe you can hide by saying that I don't have enough info, but I doubt that to be the case.
 

Guest - hayuhi
2009-12-01 12:43:08
  If only Turkey realised that the Armenian genocide is not going to go away,that it is not going to be forgotten and that it will not "rest", untill it is recognised fully and justly,then perhaps this entire facade of denial and double dealings could collapse and be replaced by the ultimate truth! A horrible genocide was committed against the Armenians by your forefathers, hard as it may be to accept it, it is the truth. The quicker this tragedy is recognised by Turkey ,the better. It is later than you think and dragging it is not at all helpful. Like covering up any lies...it only gets worse...and a lie of that magnitude is impossible to hide.Truth shall set you FREE!
 

Guest - TRUTH
2009-12-01 12:14:52
  TO ALEX: I think you ignore the fact simply because of lack of enough info in this regard. Over 20 countries in the world have already recognized the Armenian Genocide. Obviously they have done so based on the irrefutable documents strongly supporting the case. Furthermore, there have been a lot of wars in modern human history in which millions of innocent people have been killed.But we use the word “Genocide” for a number of cases due to being specific considering all its aspects leading to that case.
 

Guest - ALEX
2009-12-01 10:23:47
  ANCA are a useless group of people with nothing to do apart from change history for their own benefit. There are certainly not enough documents that support this claim! If so where are they? We are talking about the WW1 here. The region was in turmoil. the few reports & photos that I have seen to support this evidence are from people that wanted to harm & take over Turkey at the time. Certainly not evidence that would be held up in a modern context. Terrible things happened here but the bottom line is that the Armanians supported the Russians and paid a very high and dear price for it. How can these action be some else fault?
 

Guest - Armenian
2009-12-01 09:39:54
  Hah ANCA is radical? Radical to who? You want to know what's really radical, claiming that an individual or group is absolutely incapable of genocide no matter what because of their faith...
 

Guest - suleyman
2009-12-01 07:52:08
  This unfortunatly will one day be recognised, not that it is true, but it is a way for the west to create more problems for turkiye. As she keeps growing economically, they need the country to be in debt. These armenians are used by the west just for this purpose. People must remember what these armenians have done to the turks as well, why dont they also call that a genocide. They should never have sided with the russians in ww1, they should have faught with the turks to keep the enemy out. This infact is labelled as a TRAITOR, and this is exactly what they are.
 

Guest - TRUTH
2009-12-01 07:29:38
  Turkey must recognize the Armenian Genocide. In fact, there are more than enough documents confirming the systematic killings of the Armenians in Ottoman era. US has not recognized the Armenian genocide simply due to the fact that Turkey's lobby spends millions of dollars to prevent it from happening. PS: I'm not sure this text will appear in your newspaper. Never mind. I told you the truth.
 

Guest - Engin
2009-12-01 06:25:28
  To Observer: Who is distributing hate against Turkey/turkish people? Who is against Turkish-Armenian protocol? Who is supporting Dashnaks? Who has supported (may be still supporting) terrorist organization ASALA? The answer: ANCA!!!!!!
 

Guest - Richard Murphy
2009-12-01 06:16:29
  http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?_r=1&res=9B03E0DC1738E633A25750C1A9679D946596D6CF Turkish Armenians In Armed Revolt The New York Times Published: Novembver 13, 1914 Were Ready to Join Russian Invaders, Having Drilled and Collected Arms SEE DAY OF DELIVEREANCE Native Paper Says They are Prepared for Any Sacrifice - Refuse to Join Turkish Army. PETROGRAD, Nov. 12. - Reports reaching to Russian capital from the Turkish border attach increasing importance to the part the Armenians are playing in the Russo-Turkish war. In the several towns occupuied by the Russians the Armenian students have shown themselves ready to join the invading army, explaingin that they had prepared themsleves for the Russian approach by constant drilling and by gathering arms secretly. All along the line of march, according to these dispatches, the Armenian peasants are receiving the Russian troops with enthusiasm and giving provisions to them freely. An Armenian newspaper, referring to this crisis in the history of Armenia, publishes the following: "The long-anticipated day of deliverance for the Turkish Armenians is at hand, and the Armenians are prepared for any sacrifice made necessary by the performance of their manisfest duty." From this border country there have come to Petrograd further reports of armed conflicts arising from the refusal of Armenians to become Turkish conscripts and to surrender thier arms. It is now rumored that the important City of Van is now besieged by Armenian guerrila bands in great force. In Feitun the number of insurgents is said to exceed 20,000m and they are reported to have defeated all the Turkish troops sents against them, causing heavy losses to the Turks.
 

Guest - American-ARMENIAN
2009-12-01 05:32:54
  Last year, Turkey’s leaders, fearful of the impact of an Obama victory and keenly aware that their new foreign policy direction – on Iraq, Iran, Israel and a host of other issues – would seriously limit their traditional ability to beat U.S. policymakers into line, shifted gears in their Armenian Genocide denial campaign, moving from an outdated strategy of outright threats to the creation, instead, of a pretense of dialogue with Armenia, in the form of the Protocols, in order to stave off recognition of its genocidal crime by a new and potentially unpredictable U.S. Administration. Today, the results are clear: Ankara is using the Protocols "process" to help manage the tensions caused by its increasing independence from Washington in a way that both preserves its prerogatives to act against U.S. interests (on Iran, Israel, etc.) while, at the same time, preventing the U.S. from recognizing the Armenian Genocide.
 

Guest - Garo Avedis
2009-12-01 04:01:00
  Thanks for reminding me,I need to send an email or call the white house Tuesday morning,and have Obama talk to Erdogan.USA Armenians want no Reconciliation prior of Armenian Genocide recognition,so Turkey give up the denial tactics.
 

Guest - Steven Brosk
2009-12-01 04:00:35
  So Turkey continues to deny the Armenian genocide and has a new "best friend" in Iran whose leader denies the German genocide. What a life!
 

Guest - Daniel
2009-12-01 03:55:35
  The recognition of the Aremanian genocide by the US administration should have no relation with the good relations Turkey should offer Ankara... otherwise it is pure and simple black-mail-- In fact Turkey itself should come to terms with is criminal past and offer Armenian descendents of its victims substantial economic compensation .. its just an issue of simple justice..
 

Guest - Observer
2009-12-01 01:38:51
  'Radical'? I love how this article's language portrays the ANCA.
 

WRITE A COMMENT

Verification code
E-mail is required in case we need to communicate with you. It will not appear on the website and will never be used for any other purposes.
Comments policy: The Daily News seeks and supports freedom of expression and this commitment extends to our readers. Constraints include comments judged to be in violation of Turkish press law. We also moderate hate speech, libel and gratuitous insults.












Home | To Top | User Agreement and Privacy Policy | Rights and Permissions | Contact Us | Company | About News Room| RSS RSS Feed