TURKEY
• DIPLOMACY
Thursday, July 29 2010 19:35 GMT+2
Your time is 
 

Turkey to take new steps to reduce tanker traffic through straits

Font Size: Larger|Smaller
Begüm Gürsoy
Turkey to take new steps to reduce tanker traffic through straits

In an effort to protect its world-famous Bosphorus from growing tanker traffic, the government plans new steps to reduce the use of Turkish straits by persuading oil transportation companies to use the Samsun-Ceyhan oil pipeline.

The Foreign Ministry will contact the companies that transport oil via Turkish straits and ask them to “voluntarily” use the bypass pipeline, whose construction is nearing completion, deputy undersecretary Hakkı Akil said.

“The tanker traffic on the Bosphorus becomes more dangerous day by day,” Akil told daily Referans, adding that the ministry is planning to find a formula that will encourage companies to use the pipeline instead.

The Samsun-Ceyhan oil pipeline is being built by an international consortium led by Italy’s ENI and Turkey’s Çalık Group. A Russian company is also being considered to join the consortium in the future. The pipeline, with a capacity of 1.5 million barrels of oil per day, is designed to bypass Turkish straits.

Construction costs on the 550-kilometer-long pipeline are expected to be around $2 billion.

Since the early ’90s, Turkey has been engaged in an intense diplomatic struggle against Russia, the world’s most important oil and natural-gas exporter, over the use of the Turkish straits. Following some major tanker accidents in the straits that caused serious concerns among the 12 million residents of Istanbul, the Turkish government introduced a new set of measures to regulate tanker passages.

Russia has strongly rebuffed Turkey’s move, arguing that the country cannot block the free-passage right of civilian vessels through the straits under the 1936 Montreux Treaty.

“You can never explain to the residents of Istanbul the Montreux Treaty of free passage when events like the explosion of the Romanian tanker Independente occur. It would lead to a global crisis if the straits close,” Akil said, referring to the accident that took place in 1979.

“Nobody should count on the Turkish straits because someday a tanker accident will happen,” the diplomat added. “There is no such thing as zero risk.”

Highlighting the economic dimension of transferring the oil through the Samsun-Ceyhan pipeline, Akil said that the “transportation of oil in a most secure way is always more economic.”

“With the price being $75 to $80 a barrel, the $1 to $1.5 of security margin over the bypass line is nothing to the companies,” he added.

Straits could be closed someday

According to Akil, oil transfer through the straits will end someday, whether an accident occurs or not. “All companies that dig their oil in the Caspian area, Russia, the Middle East and the Black Sea should know that the Turkish straits are not a reliable solution for them anymore,” he said.

Akil said a public-private partnership model will be employed to satisfy each party and come up with a solution based on “voluntary principles.” The deputy undersecretary also noted that even though the tankers have the right of way in the straits, their average period of waiting is six days – a period that can stretch to 42 days during wintertime. This has started to cause problems in terms of global energy security, Akil said, adding that crossing the straits is less profitable than using the bypass line.

In 2007, more than 10,000 tankers carrying oil and other dangerous cargo passed through the straits, according to the official Web site of the Turkish Maritime Organization.

The Independenţe’s accident

Early in the morning of Nov. 15, 1979, the vessel Independenţe, carrying 94,000 tons of crude oil from Es Sider, Libya, collided with the Greek cargo ship M/V Evriali at the southern entrance of the Istanbul strait. The collision was followed by a large explosion at 5:20 a.m. and both vessels began to burn. The Independenţe ran aground half a mile off the port of Haydarpaşa. Forty-three members of the tanker’s 46-man crew lost their lives. The Turkish Navy immediately attempted to extinguish the fire, but abandoned its efforts due to the fire’s intensity. The directorate of the Sea of Marmara district took over the spill Nov. 19, and the Navy withdrew. The strait remained closed for weeks and the environmental effects of the accident have lasted for years.

The busy straits of Turkey

A total of 18,866 tankers passed through the Dardanelles and Bosphorus straits in 2009. During those trips, 67 accidents occurred near Istanbul, causing the deaths of eight people and the disappearances of four more. There were also 22 accidents, causing two deaths, near Çanakkale in 2009.


 

5 Comments   Bookmark and Share  printer friendly PRINTER FRIENDLY

READER COMMENTS

Guest - greywolf
2010-02-09 12:19:26
  Mr Kipouros, Tell me why is it that you greeks have to at every chance you get you have to slate turks? Who cares what it is called the turks still control them and if they close them you will all be in trouble, is it jealousey or what? you people cannot stand anything that turks have or control at least our economy is ok and will boom in 2010 unlike the greek economy which is in to put it mildly in the deep! also i think you greeks and a lot of other countries are jealous of turkey because of it's increasing value to the world and increasing power, finally i think you greeks , armenians, and certain europeans should get on with their lives and run their own countries rather than keep putting turkey down you could'nt do it after ww1 and you won't do it now. get over it and get a life!!!!!
 

Guest - Serkan
2010-02-09 12:09:49
  According to Lausanne Treaty, Turkish rights on the bosphorus were indeed restricted but this is not the case anymore after the signing of the Montreux Convention of 1936. According to this agreement, Turkey has more or less full control of the Straits. So in other words, the Straits are definately "Turkish" with a capital T.
 

Guest - Berkant Erdoğan
2010-02-09 11:47:53
  Of course the Straits are not Turkish, thats not the point. The point is what will happen if a tanker loses its cargo going thru the straits. It is far safer and cheaper to transport the oil thru a secure pipeline than thru the traffic of the Bosphorus. This is more an environmental issue than political.
 

Guest - dimitris kipouros
2010-02-09 09:07:38
  Montreux Treaty is in force. Straits are not "turkish". There are only Bosphorus and Dardanelles straits or if you like Black Sea straits with international status.
 

Guest - Murat
2010-02-09 03:48:35
  It is insanity to have this much tanker traffic through a jewel of a city. Why gamble?
 

WRITE A COMMENT

Verification code
E-mail is required in case we need to communicate with you. It will not appear on the website and will never be used for any other purposes.
Comments policy: The Daily News seeks and supports freedom of expression and this commitment extends to our readers. Constraints include comments judged to be in violation of Turkish press law. We also moderate hate speech, libel and gratuitous insults.












Home | To Top | User Agreement and Privacy Policy | Rights and Permissions | Contact Us | Company | About News Room| RSS RSS Feed