CULTURE
• ARTS
Thursday, July 29 2010 19:29 GMT+2
Your time is 
 

Times of change: Erasing the Ottomans from Mecca

Font Size: Larger|Smaller
GÜL DEMİR - NİKİ GAMM
The 350-year-old portico designed by legendary Ottoman architect Mimar Sinan for the Sacred Mosque is to be torn down now that the pilgrims have left. And with its demolition Mecca’s last traces of Ottoman architecture will be dust in the desert wind
Times of change: Erasing the Ottomans from Mecca

Now that the Kurban Bayram holiday and the time of the Hajj pilgrimage have ended, Islam’s holy city of Mecca can return to normal. But with the number of pilgrims estimated to rise to 10 million in the coming years, Saudis have been working hard non-stop for years to prepare for them.

This year approximately 2.5 million pilgrims converged on the Saudi Arabian city that for centuries has been the focal point of Muslim believers who gather to partake in the pilgrimage at least once in their lifetime provided they can afford it and are in good enough health.

How the city prepares for its visitors, however, is a question that some experts say has not been addressed appropriately, especially regarding ancient Islamic architecture and Ottoman heritage.

According to reports during this year’s Hajj, now that the pilgrims have left, the portico around the Kaabah, designed by legendary Ottoman architect Mimar Sinan in the late 1500s, is to be torn down.

Dr. Sami Angawi, head of the Amar Center for Architectural Heritage in Jeddah in Saudi Arabia, is an expert on the region's Islamic architecture. He said he acknowledges that the Saudis have the right to provide modern cities for their citizens, but also noted that many buildings from early Islamic history are being demolished and replaced with high-rise buildings. Angawi said he calculated that over 300 historical buildings in Mecca and Medina have already been destroyed.

Also, the Washington-based Gulf Institute has estimated that, in the past two decades, 95 percent of the millennium-old buildings in Mecca have been demolished.

Furthermore, the British-based Gensler architectural firm disclosed during the Hajj that is has plans to redevelop one square kilometer in the historic southern area known as Darb Al-Khalil. When completed, however, the area will include residences, hotels and amenities for pilgrims and will allow easy movement from the area to the Mosque Al-Haram, or Sacred Mosque.

Admittedly, the Saudis have the right to ensure that the annual pilgrimage occurs as safely as possible, so it is not surprising they are bent on making changes. For example, the ramp that leads to the area where the pilgrims “throw stones at the devil” at times was where hundreds could be killed when crowds rushed forward to complete this portion of the pilgrimage. Today, however, the ramp system has been changed and can hold 3 million people and has capacity for as many as 5 million.

They also expanded the Mosque Al-Haram in the center of the city, and where there were once hundreds of houses, they have now been replaced with wide avenues and city squares.

The Ottoman fortress that looked over the Kaabah for two centuries has already been razed to make room for the Abraj Al Bait Towers, which are supposed to be finished in 2010. This move provoked anger among Turks who viewed the fortress as part of Ottoman heritage. The towers, however, will have a prayer hall capable of holding 10,000 worshippers, a seven-star hotel, a shopping mall, residential housing and a parking lot. All told, the entire structure will be capable of housing up to 100,000 people.

Mecca has gone through many rejuvenations before. One example is in the late 1500s, when Ottoman Sultan Suleyman had Mimar Sinan design plans that included widening the courtyard and building porticoes. The plan was carried out in 1590 by Mimar Mehmed Ağa. Sultan Selim II, in 1571, ordered Mimar Sinan to renovate the mosque and replaced the prayer hall’s roof with domes and reinforced it with new columns. The portico plan was deferred to a later date. In 1629, excessive rain damage led to the restoration of the mosque and the Kaabah.

But with demolition of the portico, the last traces of Ottoman architecture will be erased from Mecca.

The Saudi way

In 1924, Mecca became a part of the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The Saudis espoused Wahhabism, a puritanical form of Islam that rejects many of the practices attached to Islam. In particular, certain locations in and around Mecca and Medina that were connected to the Prophet had virtually been turned into shrines. The Saudis viewed this as sacrilegious and moved to eliminate them.

Furthermore, certain buildings from the Ottoman period were made sacred because they were historical. The Saudis, however, saw these new traditions to be expendable because the kingdom was facing a growing numbers of pilgrims.

Mecca history

The foundation of the city dates back to 2000 B.C. and flourished when it became a center of north-south trade routes. Little is known about the city’s early years but some of its history can be found in the Museum of the Ancient Orient in Istanbul where pre-Islamic artifacts are displayed.

For Muslims, Mecca became important as the center of the Prophet Mohammed’s activities in the 7th century and the city from which Islam spread throughout the Middle East, Africa and Asia by military conquest and trade.

Ottomans take responsibility

In the early 1500s, Sultan Selim I conquered Egypt and from then on Ottomans provided the main caravan to Mecca for the Hajj and for centuries held responsibility for the upkeep of the Kaabah and surrounding mosque and town. Ottoman control over Mecca meant that with the exception of brigands, caravans were not raided. More people could travel safely. Fortresses and caravanasaries were built along the roads for accommodation as well as wells for drinking water.

In Mecca, the legendary Ottoman architect Mimar Sinan designed the facilities around the Kaabah including the domed portico that currently encircles the enclosure. The large Kışla Fortress of Mecca was built overlooking the Kaabah and constructed in the 18th century for defense purposes. Also, efforts to safely organize large numbers of pilgrims to certain locations were carried out.

Momentum of change

In the 16th century, no one would have thought that millions of people would flock to the religious sanctuary centuries later. Since then hostels, hans, government buildings and private houses were built, railroad lines expanded, improvements in passenger ships and ferries and finally cars and airplanes contributed to an ever-increasing number of people participating in the pilgrimage.

As is the case everywhere in the world, without more attention to development, it appears the massive influx of people will outweigh the momentum of history.


 

30 Comments   Bookmark and Share  printer friendly PRINTER FRIENDLY

READER COMMENTS

Guest - Bill, USA
2010-05-24 22:57:51
  This is truly a troubling trend. The Saudis in power have no vision, foresight, or humanity. Their bent version of Islam has only contributed to Islam's, and the world's, problems. Hello Taliban? Where is UNESCO in all of this? Why do rich Arab rulers believe that high-rises will take them to heaven? Even the Israelis have protected Turkish architecture better than the Saudis. FOR SHAME!!! And to all of the usual bickerers out there, the Ottoman Empire was always proud of its multicultural composition. No empire in the world ever handled so many different cultures and peoples, and incorporated them into daily life, as the Ottomans did. One more thing, why don't all of the hate-filled revisionists out there worry about the problems in your own countries or motherlands. There are plenty! Alas, to you, it is always much easier to blame the Turks for ALL of your problems. Viva la multiculturel Turkiye!
 

Guest - hamid
2010-01-06 05:24:43
  Ah, House of Saud, while you did lot of service to Muslims by providing safety for Hajis but you have also been too insensitive to the love and feelings which Muslims have with Holy Prophet and his historic artifacts. Islam without its history would whither away. If Saudi had their way they were capable of removing the graves of Hazrat Rasool ullah Sallalah o wasalam and his two companions. The Otomon history must be maintained at all cost. Even if it requires dismantling and moving to another place.
 

Guest - Mr .Khan
2009-12-30 17:22:18
  IT IS TRULY SAD, to see what the saudi are doing to the islamic heritage, they should learn from the ottomans masterpiece and learn from their skills. But if they are not leaving this masterpiece alone what do you think they are doing to the prophet (s.a.w) house, the beloved daughter Fatimah (s.a) grave, they have destroyed it! khlas its gone, the things the saudis are doing is unbelieveable. The british have more dignity than the saudis. That is why i believe there is no shafah in the muslim ummah
 

Guest - Rod
2009-12-09 16:15:59
  Ali, you are absolutely right. If the Saudis have to replace the portico, they should pay for it to be dismantled and re-erected at another suitable location. Never mind whether Sinan was Turkish, Armenian, Chinese, black or white or blue. He was one of the greatest architects of all time, and a fellow human being. This is truly a masterpiece of Islamic architecture and must be preseved for posterity.
 

Guest - hayuhi
2009-12-09 01:38:55
  Sinan was Armenian. This is a fact. It is also a fact that he was an extremely talented architect, to put it very humbly. Sinan's work and his legacy should be celebrated and preserved for the present and future generation of all nationalities to enjoy.
 

Guest - Abdullah - saudi
2009-12-08 11:55:26
  when i was a child i wished to be a contemporary to the time of the Ottomans, and this desire is still living with me so far.
 

Guest - Ali from Tehran
2009-12-07 03:23:36
  Unbelievable! Can you imagine the Catholic Church pulling down Bernini's colonnade in St. Peter's Square because it needed to cram more people into the piazza? Mimar Sinan is more important to the legacy of Islamic architecture than Brunelleschi, Michelangelo, Bernini and Palladio are, collectively, to Western heritage. Your government should dismantle the structure and rebuild it in Turkey, where it will be safe from the depredation of these savages.
 

Guest - Miss L.
2009-12-06 21:57:07
  @ Heisenberg: Noone can forcibly make one convert to Islam. The very phrase "there is no compulsion in Islam" is in the Quran. This is crystal clear in itself. One has to be intetional and desirous of becoming Muslim. In Islam, the individual is judged on their intentions. Do you honestly think that a man, who has been forcibly converted to Islam would spend the vast majority of his life designing and building fantastic mosques throughout the Islamic world?! Think about it... logically, please!
 

Guest - motokosoma
2009-12-06 19:45:53
  Guest (2009-12-06 00:41:38), It is cowardly to say such a bold statement without at least leaving a moniker. Ataturk created a national identity for Ottomans that was both independent of religion and ethnicity. If it weren't for him, Turkey's foundations would have been set on Turanist (modern day MHP) ideology. Ataturk defined Turkisness solely based citizenship. Istanbul-Armenian intellectuals such as Agop Dilacar were invited by Ataturk to formulate the Turkish language. Why would Ataturk ask an Armenian to help refine Turkish identity if he did not view Armenian citizens as Turks? Unfortunately, the Turkish Republic has deviated from Ataturk's vision. Modern Turkish society defines Turkishness through both Islamic heritage and ethnic identity.
 

Guest - Mr Goksel Doganay
2009-12-06 19:06:32
  To all the Turkish haters on this blog, what are you people doing here? Can you all get your facts right please. There was no forced conversion of any sought by the Ottoman Empire. Mimar Sinan is of Greek Origin but is a convert to Islam and is therefore a Muslim. You cannot forcibly convert a person to Islam. Anyone who are argues otherwise is either ignorant or has no idea of what they are talking about. In regards to Christians in the Empire, they were integrated into the empire and many of them where loyal servants to the Sultan. Did you know that many Armenians where religious Christians who designed great Mosques but also loyal to the Sultan? I am not sure if anyone is aware of psychology, but if you victimise someone at a young age and abuse them, take away their identity as is accussed of the Turks will that person turn out to be an example to society and rise above the ranks? Hardly. So I ask those people to get your facts right and not to come on this site until you know what you are writing about. The Devsirme system employed by the Turks in the Ottoman Empire was a system of recruitment which was only achieved with the permission of their families. Families with only one male children where not allowed in the program and they were given the best education in the world during their time.
 

Guest - Inez Deorah Emilia Altar
2009-12-06 12:45:00
  A great pity, history is irreplaceable.
 

Guest - asker
2009-12-06 11:27:11
  @Hairenakitz _ you are wrong! in that time ottoman empire was like the USA today...everybody wanted to make career in the empire...many became muslim or liked the ottoman life style...even wolfgang goethe, mozart or even da vinci were fascinated about the ottomans and about the islam! Even many jews from spain felt happy in the Ottoman empire..there was never a conversion or anything like that! It is like todays USA...what happened to those armenians: - William Saroian - Kim Kardashian and her afro american boyfriend - and many others...and people from all over the world who life in the USA are they now all americanized by force????
 

Guest - vural korkmaz
2009-12-06 09:24:16
  "Hairenakitz" is just another anti-Turkish hate mongering Armenian manupulating the history as a anti-Turkish hatered propaganda.
 

Guest - Paul
2009-12-06 07:59:00
  Quick! Pull out your deposits from Saudi bank accounts!
 

Guest - Guest
2009-12-06 00:41:38
  He most definitely was not a Turk just because he converted to Islam. Back then no one identified as Turks as calling someone a Turk was an insult. Instead he was simply a Muslim in the Ottoman Empire. "Turkishness" is the myth Ataturk help build.
 

Guest - norma dosky
2009-12-06 00:38:54
  one must ask the question: why did turkey unleash its fury against their armenian citizens?: from what i have come to understand it was that the armenians of turkey collaborated with the british against their country turkey---based solely upon the fact that the british were christian. that collaboration caused the backlash that is felt to this day but the armenians have never acknowledged their traitorist actions, but continue to lament the killings that they brought on themselves. it is time for them to come forward and let all know what part they played in this tragedy---they were not innocent. i am not giving turkey a pass for killing of any kind is regretable---but it is time to stop the accusations and take the hand that erdogan is extending to armenia and become a prosperous people and most important good neighbors.
 

Guest - Jen L. Jones
2009-12-05 20:08:37
  Hairenakitz: Thanks for the information on Mimar Sinan. Although I visited his birthplace a few years ago and saw the actual stone house where he grew up, I never knew these details about him. If I had known these facts, I would have viewed everything with a different eye. And I wonder, why was it not told to me that he was a born Christian, who was taken away under force?
 

Guest - motokosoma
2009-12-05 19:19:49
  Hairenakitz, Say what you want on Islamic conversions in the Ottoman Empire. However, you fail to realize that modern Turks are descendants of Islamic converts. Thus, while the Devşirme may seem "brutal" and "forced" to Christians, it infact is the existential identity of Turks. Islamic converts were the most powerful class in the Ottoman Empire for centuries. Janissaries frequently disposed of unfavorable Sultans. The Sultan's mother, or simply Valide Sultan, were often Islamic converts whose political power surpassed those of the Sultan himself. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sultanate_of_Women
 

Guest - Boreddd
2009-12-05 19:17:48
  Quick! Take your money out of Saudi banks in protest!
 

Guest - motokosoma
2009-12-05 18:57:58
  Kaya , All Turkish Citizens should indeed be considered Turks, regardless of religion. However, it is clear that the Turkish nation has never accepted non-muslims as Turks. Anatolia is historically one of the earliest and most important land for Christianity, and yet less than a 1000 indigenous Christians remain. At the very least there was a massive population exchange that displaced indigenous villagers based not on ethnicity, but on religion. Similarly, Greeks Armenians or Jewish converts to Islam were rejected by their former nation. For example, the Ottoman conquest of Crete brought much Islamic conversion among indigenous Cretan/Greeks. After the rise of Hellenistic nationalism, the Greeks considered these Muslim converts as Turks, even though most were ethnically Cretan. Jewish converts to Islam, such as followers of Sabetay Sevi, were also rejected by the international Jewish community. Islamic converts were only accepted by the Turkish Nation, and indeed have long been completely assimilated as Turks. Even in the Republican era, Turkish citizens of non-Islamic heritage are legally identified as minorities, not as Turks.
 

Guest - Heisenberg
2009-12-05 18:36:33
  @motokosoma: One cannot say Sinan "converted to Islam." More accurate to say "He was forcibly converted to Islam by Ottoman kidnappers." Seems fair to say he was not Turkish. @Kaya: Turkey is 99.9% Muslim and very negative to non Muslims. Seems you need to be Muslim to be Turkish. Arabs are more liberal on this point than the Turks.You can be a non-Muslim Arab.
 

Guest - Hairenakitz
2009-12-05 16:43:08
  What Goes Around; Comes Around. For 700 years Ottoman sword forced Christian Armenians into Turkification and conversion to Islam, long before Ottoman government sponsored Genocide of entire surviving Armenians at the beginning of last century. Not many Turks today know about their brutal history; even though they proudly name many famous Turkified Armenians. Ottoman architect Mimar Sinan, is the best example of ‘Ottoman Devşirme System’! Devşirme or devshirme was the practice by which the Ottoman Empire conscripted boys from Christian families, who were taken from their families by force, converted to Islam, trained and enrolled in one of the four royal institutions: the Palace, the Scribes, the Religious and the ‘Janissary’ soldiers. The devşirme system humiliated non-Muslim societies controlled by the Ottomans and was resisted. Sinan was born with the name Joseph as an Armenian or Rûm Christian in 1489, in a small town called Ağırnas (present-day Mimarsinanköy) near the city of Kayseri in Anatolia (as stated in an order by Sultan Selim II.) One argument that leads credence to his Armenian background is a letter he wrote to Selim II in 1573, asking the Sultan to spare his family from the general exile of Kayseri's Armenian community. Little is known of his family background, apart from the fact that his father was a stone mason and carpenter, and Sinan (Joseph) grew up helping him in these businesses. There are three brief records in the library of the Topkapı Palace, dictated by Sinan to his friend Mustafa Sâi. In these manuscripts, Sinan divulges some details of his youth and military career. According to these documents, Sinan was the son of "Abdülmenan" (the anonym of Christian fathers whose sons were Muslim converts). In 1512, he was conscripted into Ottoman service via the Devşirme system. He went to Istanbul as a recruit of the Janissary Corps, and was circumcised as he was converted to Islam. Since he was over twenty-one years old, he was not admitted to the Imperial Enderun College in the Topkapı Palace but was sent instead to an auxiliary school. Some records claim that he might have served the Grand Vizier İbrahim Paşa as a novice of the Ibrahim Pasha School. Possibly, he was given the Islamic name Sinan there. He initially learned carpentry and mathematics but through his intellectual qualities and ambitions, he soon assisted the leading architects and got his training as an architect. When the Ottoman army captured Cairo, Sinan was promoted to chief architect and was given the privilege of tearing down any buildings in the captured city that were not according to the city plan. During the campaign in the East, he assisted in the building of defences and bridges, such as a bridge across the Danube. He converted churches into mosques. During the Persian campaign in 1535 he built ships for the army and the artillery to cross Lake Van. For this he was given the title Haseki'i, Sergeant-at-Arms in the body guard of the Sultan, a rank equivalent to that of the Janissary Ağa.
 

Guest - Kaya
2009-12-05 16:10:18
  @motokosoma - you dont need to convert to Islam to become Turkish.
 

Guest - Fikret
2009-12-05 15:07:29
  Is it possible to dismantle this monument and transport it to turkey and rebuild it as it would be a great tourist attraction and a historical monument.Prosperity of the Turkish nation of its cultural past because if it was not for the warrior people there would be no Middle East as we know it today it would have been a European colony and European colonist would have settled there .
 

Guest - Armenian
2009-12-05 13:41:55
  motokosoma, Armenian or Greek he may have been but conversion to Islam did not turn him into a Turk back when he was alive. If anything being called a Turk may have been an insult. He simply became a Muslim. Instead, you can say that Ataturk converted Ottoman non-Arab Muslims into Turks. He tried with Kurds too, but Kurds did not abandon their heritage.
 

Guest - David Coors
2009-12-05 13:31:05
  There was not a single person in Ottoman ranks in Turkish origins. All 36 Ottoman sultans were givin birth by concubines non of whom of Turkish origins. Non of the Ottoman sultans were of Turkish origins. Non of Ottoman official were of Turkish origins. They were all devshirmes (taken from Christian families by force at young ages and educated at Sultan's schools). Sinan was an Armenian devshirme. Every single Ottoman Vezir, Grand Vezir, goverment minister, governor, mayor, military and civilian officer was a devshirme. Ottoman sultans wanted that way to keep Turks out so they could not gain power and influence to rise up Ottoman rule. Because Ottoman rule was established on the ruins of many Turkish principalities and states in Anatolia. For that purposrpose in mind, Ottoman system of oppression kept Turks totally poor, ignorant and powerless.
 

Guest - motokosoma
2009-12-05 11:52:19
  Genitsaros, Sinan may have been born Greek or Armenian Orthodox, but once he converted to Islam, he became Turkish.
 

Guest - genitsaros
2009-12-05 02:48:49
  I am sorry to bring you the bad news but Sinan was born Greek Orthodox. Having said that Karamanlis was Turkish.
 

Guest - Vural Korkmaz
2009-12-05 01:40:40
  I only remember Lawrence of Arabia and how Arabs (brother of Turks in Islam) cooperated with the victors of WWI and raped, tortured and massacred Turkish subjects of Ottoman empire and forced them out if their homes and countries in order to topple Ottoman empire (their brother Khalif in Islam) when I see Arabs and their Islamic places. I met quite a few Arabs from almost all Arab countries including Saudi Arabia. They were all heavy drinkers, womanizers, gambellers and everything else their relogion Islam forbids and they obey. I met a buch of Arab businessmen, very professionally dressed and respectful looking some from Eagyp some from Saudi Arabia, in O'Hare airport, Chicago IL, USA and elesewhere bargining the price of prostitutes they were going to hire with a pimp. They use their religion Islam as a tool to oppress people, nothing else.
 

Guest - ali
2009-12-05 00:31:21
  Those who forget their histories there is no future as well. I can say no more, I am too sad for them.
 

WRITE A COMMENT

Verification code
E-mail is required in case we need to communicate with you. It will not appear on the website and will never be used for any other purposes.
Comments policy: The Daily News seeks and supports freedom of expression and this commitment extends to our readers. Constraints include comments judged to be in violation of Turkish press law. We also moderate hate speech, libel and gratuitous insults.












Home | To Top | User Agreement and Privacy Policy | Rights and Permissions | Contact Us | Company | About News Room| RSS RSS Feed