OPINION
• CONTRIBUTOR
Thursday, July 29 2010 19:28 GMT+2
Your time is 
 

Things we've learned from the Tekel workers

Font Size: Larger|Smaller
RIZA TÜRMEN

The resistance of workers from the former state-owned alcohol and tobacco monopoly, or Tekel, has continued for about two months. Now they are on an indefinite hunger strike. Some may die in the end.

Of the strikers’ actions, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said, “This is their decision.” Human life is so cheap.

No matter how hard the government tries to end the strike, no matter how seriously it threatens and says, “If it is not ended by the end of the month, we’ll send in security forces,” the strike does not seem to come to an end. The Tekel workers are struggling for their lives, for their bread and butter.

Their resistance will be a turning point for Turkey for different reasons. With tremendous public support, the ruling Justice and Development Party, or AKP’s, neo-liberal politics are being questioned for the first time. The AKP’s class structure has come into view. The real contradiction between the AKP government and the working class, as well as the poor, has revealed itself. It has been seen that the government’s understanding based on service and amity has nothing to do with social justice.

As a matter of fact, the AKP’s neo-liberal politics have contributed to poverty. In order to understand this, the strike of Tekel workers was not necessary. The government’s minimum-wage policy to lower labor costs, rather than better living conditions, or its stance against labor unions, which is criticized by the European Union, are a few of the many indicators of that.

In addition to Turkey’s unique conditions, such as the Sept. 12 military coup’s blow against labor unions, the increase in the number of illegal workers and the drop in the number of union members, neo-liberal policies as a result of globalization have given birth to an understanding that conflict among classes is over and identity politics is what’s valid. But such an understanding has proven to be wrong, thanks to the Tekel strike. As seen in the strike, the conflict of classes intersects with identity demands. Tekel workers include Kurds, Alevis and women wearing headscarves.

In reality, classes do, potentially, exist. The problem is the settlement of class awareness and how it could be achieved. Past experiences show that the most critical element of class awareness is the conflict of classes. The Tekel strike is important in this regard.

The function of identity politics shouldn’t be denied either. Recognition of identities is a real demand. In a democratic society, none can be overlooked. But in a democratic society, attention should also be paid to the demands of classes and demands of equality. Identity and social-justice demands are not in contradiction; they are complementary. They are parts of the same whole.

A Kurd joining the Tekel strike wants to earn a living and asks for recognition of his Kurdish identity. A Kurdish Tekel worker wants to live in a society that is more egalitarian and fair in both aspects. The problem is that the government’s policies do not answer to bread-and-butter demand and fall short of meeting identity demands as well.

Democracy today consists of social justice, equality and citizenship rights as much as pluralism.

In a country failing to bring in social justice, it is impossible to talk about democracy. What benefits can democracy provide for workers? In a country such as Turkey, where inequalities dominate, freedoms do not mean too much. The only real freedom for Tekel workers who are unable to earn a living is to die in a hunger strike. Power rules a social order based on inequality, not individual rights.

The citizenship concept is closely related to equality. Participation of individuals in society as equal citizens depends on the elimination of poverty. For that, doors to struggle against inequality should remain open to civil servants, workers and all laborers.

If we long for a more democratic, equalitarian Turkey where workers do not have to go on hunger strikes, we should support the strike of Tekel workers. A government loyal to democracy has to hear this voice.

* Rıza Türmen is a columnist for daily Milliyet, in which this piece appeared Monday. It was translated into English by the Daily News staff.


 

2 Comments   Bookmark and Share  printer friendly PRINTER FRIENDLY

READER COMMENTS

Guest - Mr Goksel Doganay
2010-02-09 20:02:04
  Riza Turmen you speak very compassionately regarding Tekel workers and their rights, but where were you when you were a Judge in Turkey? Where was your compassion then? You support the segregation of headscarved women in education yet you expect readers to believer your articles. It is easy for you to make suggestions when your a retired Judge who has received a taxpayer funded salary including accomodation for most of your legal career. Are you willing to pay the salaries of Tekel workers? Would you be willing to take a pay cut from your pension? I wonder?
 

Guest - Ernest Untermann
2010-02-09 17:26:43
  It's understandable, given that it makes for attention-grabbing, sensationalistic news, but too much attention has been paid by the international press to an alleged hunger strike or "death fast" among the Tekel workers. The idea of the hunger strike was put forth by Turk-Is, which is itself, along with its mouthpiece Mustafa Kumlu, being protested by the striking workers (It was not in support of the union that the workers congregated in front of its headquarters). The motivation behind the hunger strike, from the union management's perspective, is to end the strike quickly before it spreads, while simultaneously diverting attention from the spontaneous, working-class nature of the strike. Facts of worker solidarity are thus replaced by romantic, mystical ideas of martyrdom. This is how unions have derailed strikes for nigh 100 years. Incidentally, how can any respect be paid to the largest, most powerful union in a country where the general strike, historically the most powerful weapon in the working class' limited arsenal, is "illegal." The author is to be commended for writing the first article on the strike I've read to draw attention to the Turkish-Kurdish fraternity on display in Ankara, further proof that the conflict between the two ethnic groups is cultivated and perpetuated by the state. However, I have yet to read an account in the press of how, when buses carrying Tekel workers from the Kurdish cities were barred by police from entering Ankara, their Turkish brothers protested on their behalf, quickly securing their passage in order that all the striking workers might enter the city together. I think this is the sort of thing that would make for great, socially relevant journalism.
 

WRITE A COMMENT

Verification code
E-mail is required in case we need to communicate with you. It will not appear on the website and will never be used for any other purposes.
Comments policy: The Daily News seeks and supports freedom of expression and this commitment extends to our readers. Constraints include comments judged to be in violation of Turkish press law. We also moderate hate speech, libel and gratuitous insults.












Home | To Top | User Agreement and Privacy Policy | Rights and Permissions | Contact Us | Company | About News Room| RSS RSS Feed