TURKEY
• NATIONAL
Friday, September 03 2010 03:22 GMT+2
Your time is 
 

Turkish protesters search for unrestricted Internet, blocked by judiciary

Font Size: Larger|Smaller
Marching for freedom of speech and the right to access information and share opinions, hundreds of protesters gather at central Istanbul’s Taksim Square to voice their opposition to recent judicial decisions that have cemented the Turkish government’s ban on YouTube and thousands of other websites. ‘We claim Turkey is an information highway. How can an information highway exist when 7,000 exits are blocked?’ says one protester
The march on İstiklal Avenue attracts several hundreds of people from various Internet groups. DAILY NEWS photo, Mehveş KONUK

The march on İstiklal Avenue attracts several hundreds of people from various Internet groups. DAILY NEWS photo, Mehveş KONUK

Despite the hot weather, more than a thousand people marched Saturday in Istanbul demanding a free Internet in response to a recent court order that cemented the ban of YouTube.

YouTube, the popular video-sharing portal and symbolic website representing protests for Internet freedom in Turkey, has been banned by a series of court decisions, the earliest of which dates back to May 5, 2008 apparently for insulting the memory of legendary Turkish figure Mustafa Kemal Atatürk.

The actual problem, according to the courts, is YouTube’s parent, Google. The search engine giant is in a dispute with the Turkish government over taxes.

Another part of the ongoing dispute regards proxy websites that bypass government restrictions on access to blocked websites. In response to a question submitted by Prosecutor Kürşat Kural from Ankara Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office’s Press Crimes Investigation Bureau, the Telecommunication Transmission Directorate, or TİB, said 44 new IP addressed were identified as able to provide access to YouTube.

Kural demanded an additional decision from an Ankara criminal court to block the 44 new sites. When the court applied for bans on the IPs, an objection to the decision carried the case to a higher court, where the case about the new IP addresses continues.

Nihad Karslı, a lawyer for the Internet Technologies Association, or İNTED, said they plan to object if the lower court’s decision is not overturned and will likely take the matter to the European Court of Human Rights if necessary.

Street disagrees with courtroom

The march on İstiklal Avenue in Istanbul on Saturday attracted several hundreds of people from various Internet groups, nongovernmental organizations and Internet platforms such as many popular Turkish websites, including sourtimes.org, zaytung.com and bobiler.org, the Young Civilians, Penguen magazine, “Sansüre Sansür” (Censor Censorship) and “Sansüre Karşı Ortak Platform” (Joint Platform against Censorship). The group gathered at Taksim Square at 5 p.m. and marched to Galatasaray Square holding large banners reading “Censorship-free Internet,” “Do not click on our freedom,” and “Censorship protects you from the truth.” Demonstrators also had whistles, portable music systems and tambourines.

The joint press declaration read at Galatasaray Square protested Law No. 5651, which has resulted in access to more than 5,000 Internet sites being blocked in Turkey. The protesters demanded that the law be repealed and access to the sites affected by the law be re-established. An additional 500 websites are banned by various other laws and the protesters demanded that Turkish Internet users be allowed to access them as well.

“The Internet is the good news of a full attentive utopia of democracy being possible without a hierarchy,” the statement read. “We, as Internet users, do not accept laws that do not fit the Information Age. We know that the recent Internet policies followed by government institutions is censorship.”

The demonstrators demanded an unrestricted Internet from the government in the name of the freedom of speech and the right to obtain information.

Dylan Ware, a musician who promotes his work on YouTube, said: “I think it is very important to protect our right to access documentation and other people’s opinions and to be able to express our own and have people hear them. It is one of the most important things for democracy and it is the key to development for a country. We have to protect that. Because people try to take that right away from us regularly, that is what happening now. Blocking YouTube because somebody said something bad about Atatürk is like blocking books. It is too wide reaching. It interferes with our basic human rights. Turkey signed the European Convention of Human Rights in 1950 and article 10 guarantees our right to be able to express ourselves. This law breaks this agreement and human rights.”

Faik Polat, a member of the Censorship-free Internet platform, said: “Today 7,000 sites are blocked in Turkey. If we want to be an information society, why are 7,000 sites blocked? We claim Turkey is an information highway. How can an information highway exist when 7,000 exits are blocked?”

Merve Alıcı, a member of the Young Civilians, said: “The legal basis for this ban was in fact related to child porn. But this decision was exploited and now 7,000 sites are blocked. With this protest, we have reached many people because there has been broad participation. We not only protest, but also we convey our declaration to Parliament. I believe this will be taken seriously.”


 

15 Comments   Bookmark and Share  printer friendly PRINTER FRIENDLY

READER COMMENTS

Guest - Happy and Jumpy
2010-07-20 09:50:13
  Greek and Foreigner. We have seen at numerous occasions ministers from the present AKP governmnet defending the ban. So please read a little more before lecturing.
 

Guest - dearfriend
2010-07-20 04:00:22
  this is the start of your "new" iranturk culture that you chose and i am sure that this is the begining i am sure "sharia" law for all is only one more election away!!!! turkey this is what you asked for ,,,i cry for a country that i loved as a model where all people shared in this great nation,,,,its a shame!!!
 

Guest - Jamie Nichols
2010-07-20 02:07:06
  As long as Turkey succeeds in restricting the access of its people to information from outside its borders, whether via the internet or otherwise, it is doomed to be a second-rate backwater of a country. Whoever is responsible for this promoting or permitting of ignorance and stupidity in Turkey by cutting off access to internet sites, even if done under the guise of being necessary for tax collection, ought to be tied to a donkey and paraded through the streets of Istanbul with a dunce's cap on his head and a sign hanging from his neck reading: "Have pity on this poor fool."
 

Guest - motokosoma
2010-07-19 20:48:45
  The youtube ban has absolutely nothing to do with Ataturk. Its an ulterior cover for its real purpose: to block PKK propaganda or other videos deemed dangerous to "Turkish values." Pornographic and gambling sites are also banned, along with what the AKP believes as anti-Islamic sites. Elected governments always compromise with the Deep State.The ban may have been initiated by the State, but the civilian government maintains it for their own interests. The AKP, whatever they say, has not acted against internet censorship.
 

Guest - Me
2010-07-19 20:44:02
  FOREIGNER AND GREEK What you write might very well be true, but you can't argue that is it the AKP bent on destroying the wine industry in Turkey and monitoring what is watched on television and remember "Homosexuality is a disease" straight from the mouth of the AKP. Everyone is always quick to blame the CHP and the military or judiciary, but where would Turkey be today without their efforts? I do not think they would be a full democracy, but yet another islamic controlled country like Iran. Food for thought. Maybe next time you guys could blame all of Turkey's woes on the USA, that evil dishonest country on the other side of the world.
 

Guest - katie
2010-07-19 19:36:57
  Turks think they live in a democracy..... only when they have lived in one would they see Turkey is most definitely an...... Islamic democracy ..... as OBAMA said.
 

Guest - Greek
2010-07-19 17:33:14
  Some of these comments are beyond moronic. It is akp that is FIGHTING THE BAN! Do you not read? For goodness sake, hate them if you wish, but this ban is the work of the secularists who cannot hear any criticism of their god 'at a turk' i said this many times before so how many times do you need to be told? READ!
 

Guest - Foreigner
2010-07-19 14:03:25
  Please read the title: "blocked by judiciary" and the rest of the article. Read other articles in HDN where the secularists and nationalists are accusing AKP of trying to 'gain control' of the judiciary. Read of EU support to the Government. Add the three together and stop speculating - you'll see this has nothing to do with AKP, Erdogan or his government but with the secularists that are trying to keep people under locks, just what they've been for more than 50 years now!
 

Guest - Nick
2010-07-19 11:42:59
  Word on the street is that the AKP government has little say in some of these bans. Various conspiracy theories and contradictory opinions are flying around of course, but many bans come straight from "Ataturk Associations." They find objectional material and then apply directly to the courts. Judicial, legislative, and executive powers here are not very well balanced and they have different areas of power. The courts can ban many sites without official ruling party approval. While I'm sure the AKP does have a hand in some of the bans, many, especially related to Ataturk, are done by the more secular establishments in Turkey.
 

Guest - Niko
2010-07-19 11:35:57
  Things like this are what proves to Europeans that Turkey is not European and does not have a European mentality...
 

Guest - Handel
2010-07-19 09:27:59
  As I see it, there are two questins to be addressed here: How are all other countries in the world dealing with the tax issues around you tube? And are all web pages with similar tax structures blocked?
 

Guest - John McAuliffee
2010-07-19 08:53:10
  Is all this nonsense part of Erdogan's idea of Democracy ? Is that also a part of Erdogan's planned reforms. Does Turkish government think this will be tolerated in the EU or any other civilised country ? If people could watch YouTube for example they could judge forthemselves the fairy tales Erdogan's government is feeding them with. Not to mention other 7000 sites ! What is Erdogan trying to hide ? Is Turkey really moving backwards to the dark ages under the pretence of reforms ? If a person loses his choice as to what to see and what not to watch or what to read etc he becomes a robot. Does Erdogan want his supporters to become zombies ?
 

Guest - Lion
2010-07-19 08:45:38
  Why is the government trying to block internet access of these sites? Whoever holds the sources of information, can manipulate the public opinion in his will! It is then easy to hide decisions that don't go hand in hand with the citizens' interests but with the narrow interests of the ruling party
 

Guest - Commodore1946
2010-07-19 04:14:08
  After a 4 year absence, I recently visited Istanbul, a city I love in a country where I've lived and visited many times. I was shocked to find so many blocked internet sites. I couldn't even open my bank's website. This isn't the Turkey I love. The Turkish government must be afraid of its own people. Come on Mr. Erdoğan. Don't you know that the truth will set you free!
 

Guest - George
2010-07-18 22:36:36
  One of the most important scientists in the world, Richard Dawkins, has had his website banned in Turkey for 2 years now. Why? Because he dared to make fun of the creationist nutter Oktar. It's absurd! The lunatics have taken over the asylum. Well done to everyone who took part in the protest.
 

WRITE A COMMENT

Verification code
E-mail is required in case we need to communicate with you. It will not appear on the website and will never be used for any other purposes.
Comments policy: The Daily News seeks and supports freedom of expression and this commitment extends to our readers. Constraints include comments judged to be in violation of Turkish press law. We also moderate hate speech, libel and gratuitous insults.












Home | To Top | User Agreement and Privacy Policy | Rights and Permissions | Contact Us | Company | About News Room| RSS RSS Feed