OPINION
• FATMANUR ERDOĞAN
Thursday, July 29 2010 19:51 GMT+2
Your time is 
 

Bloggers: Turn the light onto yourselves

Font Size: Larger|Smaller

www.fatmanurerdogan.com

 

You can learn a lot about people by watching how consistently they apply their standards of behavior. For example, take how people react to Turkey's ban on YouTube. YouTube is the world's most popular video sharing site, and many of us are puzzled by Turkey's banning of it. We question our democracy. We blame the courts for not understanding how the Web works. We get angry at the people who found a few of the videos and comments so offensive that they took the issue to court and got the whole site shut down. We claim to not understand this intolerance, and we blame it on conservatives or the provincially-minded. We think that if only people were more open-minded, if only they knew better how the Web works, YouTube would be accessible. 

Turkey's blogger community, one of the most Internet-savvy groups in the country, can't believe anyone could misunderstand the nature of YouTube so badly. Most bloggers here believe the ban is ridiculous, and the people responsible for it should be embarrassed for themselves. They look at the situation with a smug sense of self-satisfaction, and they congratulate themselves on being so open-minded and so understanding of the world.

But before bloggers congratulate themselves, they should take a closer look at their own actions. For example, take how they handle the comments people make on their blog posts. Over the years I have seen many bloggers who choose to "moderate comments." This means that if a reader reads a blog post on, for example, Turkish politics, and tries to leave a comment, the comment won't show up until the blogger sees it, decides it's okay, and approves its appearance on the Web page. 

It's kind of off-putting. It's like the writer is saying, "This blog is my castle, and you can only come in if I decide to let you." And it's not just beginners who set their defenses so high. Recently, I came across a blog started by a communications consultant in Turkey who has been in the communications business for 25 years. Her blog's headline stated, right at the top of the page for all to see, "Commenters who are rude will not be allowed to comment."

This consultant's business is all about understanding changes in the communications world and showing people how to adapt to them quickly. You would think someone like that would have a more thorough understanding of social media tools. Yet by bluntly exerting her control over potential commenters, she was showing a terrible misunderstanding of the user dynamics of the blog world. Blogging is about sharing, and if you are putting your opinions out there for the world to read, you need to be ready to receive commentary from all sorts of people. A blog is a community discussion, and the community decides what is rude and what is not. It's not something the writer alone gets to control. 

There is an important parallel between YouTube's being banned in Turkey, and the attitudes of bloggers in general. Both instances deal with wanting to have control over a conversation so you can avoid anything you might not like personally. In the case of YouTube, a minority has an emotional reaction to a comment, and they use the courts as a lever to shut down the entire site. In the case of bloggers, the owners monitor and delete comments they personally don't like. 

It's natural to want to exert control over the world around you, but the Internet isn't really a good place to do it. That goes double for blogs. I've been writing them for years and reading them for even longer, and I know from experience that they are about conversations, and the best conversations happen when the person who starts them is willing to relinquish control over them. 

So before you ask others to meet your standards for respect, tolerance, or anything else, examine your own actions first. When other people see you living up to your own standards, they will be far more likely to accept your request that they live up to them, too.


 

8 Comments   Bookmark and Share  printer friendly PRINTER FRIENDLY

READER COMMENTS

Guest - Bulent
2010-07-27 09:35:05
  I'm a blogger and I do allow both anonymous and uncontrolled comments on my blog. However I do keep track of all comments made and when I spot SPAM comments I delete them manually but never control a comment beforehand. It is possible for bloggers to allow more freedom for the community surrounding them. So this article does have a point in my opinion. The fact these comments are unmoderated truly proves so too.
 

Guest - Erhan Sanbay
2009-12-27 16:13:52
  @YABANCHİıSTANBUL: There are a couple of online newspapers in Turkey which don’t allow some comments even if they are in line with the Turkish Law. They misuse the Turkish Law. But here, you can see your comment posted. So, why prejudging? David. S also sees this fact and agrees with YABANCHİıSTANBUL. That’s another weird situation. Online newspapers are different than blogs. They have a social responsibility – since Turkey is a social country – to prevent from any kind of social chaos in the society. For this reason and especially for Turkey’s sociopolitic status, there is a need in Turkey to apply the Turkish Law in comments. It seems 25 years which you spend here haven’t been enough for you to understand this. One’s own mentality cannot be applied to each and every country. Otherwise we would be a homogen nation in the world. On the other hand, banning Youtube or deleting a comment in a blog, whatsoever, they are coming from the same approach. They are all about social or personal values. Yes, values! If you don’t like a user commenting in your blog, it means he or she is out of your values. The same applies for the government. (this Youtube issue). However, it is impossible for the goverment to reach every citizen to talk about his/her online activity, but it is possible for a blogger to reach a user to do this. In my previous comment I gave an example of Ms. Erdogan’s blog. Check it and learn how to moderate a blog without deleting the comments.
 

Guest - wolf
2009-12-26 20:50:58
  I can not see the logic in the columnists claim. Just because you are editing your blog, does that mean that you are not supporting freedom of expression? I am for freedom of expression, but that does not mean that I would invite a person to my home who is constantly misbehaving, swearing, too explicit etc. A country should guard everybodys right to state their opinion, but that does not mean that private persons have to provide tools (let them use their blogs) for everybody to state their opinions. I simply believe that this columnist does not really understands what freedom of expression means.
 

Guest - David. S
2009-12-26 20:22:32
  Well said YABANCHİıSTANBUL, I agree with you completely.
 

Guest - Erhan Sanbay
2009-12-25 21:05:27
  Let me give you an example. I am a follower of Ms. Erdogan’s blog: kariyeryolculugu.com. Even though I have no interest in career issues this blog keeps me interested with its various subtopics. I would say that she is a good moderator. I have never seen her deleting a comment so far. But I guess this choice has some reasons. As far as I know, she is a great communicator in both job and life sense and this results in a large network. In her blog there is a smooth conversation among users. If you ask how? Let me explain. I think she has a good and constructive relationship with the majority of users , so the newcomers of her blog always realize the quality of conversation and adopt themselves to it. That’s the secret of Ms. Erdogan’s blog: kariyeryolculugu.com. She knows that it is possible to moderate a blog without eliminating the comments and in her article she indicates other bloggers’ defensive behaviour. I agree with Ms. Erdogan. However, this blog issue depends also on the name of the blog. I don’t think that the users googling “kariyer” have offensive behaviour than the ones googling and finding a blog - for example - under the keyword “laiklik”. But I think Ms. Erdogan’s solution would work for any kind of blog in a way. However, I by all means support that a blogger should control spams and unwanted words in comments.
 

Guest - Brian
2009-12-25 11:36:59
  Fatmanurs' argument is very weak and has no relationship whatsoever to the Youtube ban, the Richard Dawkins website ban and thousands of others. Bloggers have their own agenda and cannot be chastised for this. On the other hand Youtube has NO agenda and will publish ALL opinions. This is the reason Youtube is banned in Turkey. There is no excuse for the ban and why should one expect bloggers to change their attitude before Youtube is allowed to be seen in Turkey? Of course it is all a joke as anyone can see Youtube or other banned sites if they wish. You only need a rudimentary knowledge of the internet to bypass this stupid ban. But blaming other people on the Youtube ban is nonsensical, simplistic and downright wrong. Bloggers wanting to control a conversation and Youtube wanting to allow ALL conversation are two separate issues.
 

Guest - MRDHS
2009-12-25 10:24:01
  Your "comments policy" is no different than what this article is discussing. Please explain how it is different if you think it is. MRDHS
 

Guest - YABANCHİıSTANBUL
2009-12-25 08:17:02
  It’s bizarre and strange to compare a state ban with the moderation feature which blogs have. And, yes, I am a blogger for almost 5 years and an (inter) communication manager for over 25 years only I am an he. Let me explain. A society which is restricted regarding communication on both macro (state) and meso level (education / work force) creates automatically rebellious and reluctant people. These people start their own blogs, and consider – indeed as Ms. Erdogan suggests – these as their own place, castle which has to be defended by all means. And that’s understandable. If you are even restricted on Freedom of Thought, then you create, often under a fake name your own journal. I guess that Ms. Erdogan knows how many writers, journalists and other pundits are on trial on prosecuted in Turkey the last years. And since a blog is something private and personal, on micro level it’s indeed the blog owner’s responsibility and rights to decide who are able to join the party. And that’s something different than imposing restrictive rules, bans etc. on people, the web and companies who run free sites. Therefore a really bizarre comparison. And now I am waiting if this comment is in line with Turkish law and the moderator approve my mild form of criticism. Weird, isn’t it? Criticizing bloggers but safe behind the moderation feature…If the Turkish communication industry for once become a little more mature, then that ‘controlling the other’ would disappear. But as long as I see the most strange dialogues on news forums and blogs in Turkey, I stay pessimistic and I am fully booked with work Happy Christmas!
 

WRITE A COMMENT

Verification code
E-mail is required in case we need to communicate with you. It will not appear on the website and will never be used for any other purposes.
Comments policy: The Daily News seeks and supports freedom of expression and this commitment extends to our readers. Constraints include comments judged to be in violation of Turkish press law. We also moderate hate speech, libel and gratuitous insults.












Home | To Top | User Agreement and Privacy Policy | Rights and Permissions | Contact Us | Company | About News Room| RSS RSS Feed