TURKEY
• DIPLOMACY
Thursday, July 29 2010 19:45 GMT+2
Your time is 
 

'Serbia will apologize for Srebrenica slaughter,' Turkish FM says

Font Size: Larger|Smaller
Uğur ERGAN

Turkey’s top diplomat said Thursday that Serbia would soon officially “apologize” for the Srebrenica Massacre that claimed the lives of hundreds of Bosnian Muslims in 1995.

“The next step is the apology to be released by the Serbs over the Srebrenica slaughter,” Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu told a small group of journalists accompanying him en route to Bulgaria.

In recent months, Davutoğlu has engaged in intense diplomatic talks between Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and other countries in the region in an effort to end potential strife between the neighboring nations. Earlier, Turkey-mediated talks had prompted Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina to appoint ambassadors to each others’ capitals.

Despite Davutoğlu’s statements, the Serbian parliament is only expected to issue a declaration expressing its sadness over the loss of innocent lives during the 1992-1995 war periods. Davutoğlu will initiate more meetings between the two countries in the upcoming months to ensure stable progress in the region.

“Turks and Serbs were in a 1,000-year-old conflict. It goes back to the 12th century. However, our problems with Armenia are only 100 years old,” Davutoğlu said. “If we can solve problems in the Balkans with Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, why can’t we do the same with Armenia?”

Noting that the mood of the bilateral relations between Turkey and Serbia has drastically changed within the span of just a year, Davutoğlu said he had met with his Serbian counterpart 11 times in the last six months.

“Armenians do not talk with us on the Nagorno-Karabakh issue. But we say the opposite: If we could solve the problem with Serbs through dialogue, we can do it with you as well,” the Turkish foreign minister said. “We tell them, thanks to our efforts, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia could overcome their problems. Let us do the same for you and Azerbaijan.”


 

7 Comments   Bookmark and Share  printer friendly PRINTER FRIENDLY

READER COMMENTS

Guest - Phantom
2010-03-20 21:33:21
  Nothing the Turks do or say shocks me any more. The irony in a Turkish leader lecturing Serbs over the killing of 7000 Muslims is immense. Nuff said!
 

Guest - John K.
2010-03-19 20:20:41
  That means the Serbs are man enough to accept their guilt and move on, unlike turks...
 

Guest - Borisav
2010-03-19 18:12:37
  @ Guest – 7 Hills You are right, but there are a few specifics. Serbia must show its regrets and accept indirect responsibility because Serbia supported Bosnian Serb Army. However, supporting one side in a civil war in the other country and actually committing crimes against humanity in such war, are two different things. On the other hand, there were other countries which were deeply involved into the conflict too. Only impartial and justified approach may help in the healing process among nations in Bosnia. The article is very good, but there was a mistake, it was not several hundreds, but regrettably, several thousand men killed in Srbernica. Bosnian Serbs, blind in revenge, released women and children but massacred the complete military unit which, from Srebrenica, Safe Haven and Demilitarized Zone previously massacred Serbian villages around the town. Will the USA express regrets for instigating the developments arising from their smuggling of arms into the Safe Haven and DMZ?
 

Guest - Amir
2010-03-19 14:35:05
  Serbia apologize” for the Srebrenica Massacre that claimed the lives of hundreds of Bosnian Muslims in 1995... To be more accurate, not hundreds, but between 7 and 8 thousands Muslims were killed by the Serbs just in the small town of Srebrenica.
 

Guest - 7 Hills
2010-03-19 08:41:08
  Good job.. brave and respectable people apologize for mistakes and bad behavior.
 

Guest - Niko
2010-03-19 04:31:09
  problems with Armenians are only 100 years old?? Is that a joke?
 

Guest - Dinos Plassaras
2010-03-19 04:19:27
  That's an amazing comparison by Davutoglu of Serbia vs. Armenia. So here is a short refresher course. Sebia's war of independence marks the first time in Ottoman history an entire Christian population had risen up against the Sultan. The entrenchment of French troops in the western Balkans, the incessant political crises in the Ottoman Empire, the growing intensity of the Austro-Russian rivalry in the Balkans, the intermittent warfare which consumed the energies of French and Russian Empires and the outbreak of protracted hostilities between the Porte and Russia are but a few of the major international developments which directly or indirectly influenced the course of the Serbian revolt. Miloš Obrenović I, a revolutionary leader, diplomate and the hereditary Prince of SerbiaDuring the First Serbian Uprising, or the first phase of the revolt, led by Karađorđe Petrović, Serbia was independent for almost a decade before the Ottoman army was able to reoccupy the country. Shortly after this, the Second Serbian Uprising began. Led by Miloš Obrenović, it ended in 1815 with a compromise between the Serbian revolutionary army and the Ottoman authorities.Armenians, for the most part, remained passive during these years, earning them the title of millet-i sadıka or the "loyal millet."In the mid-1860s to early 1870s, Armenians began to ask for better treatment from the Ottoman government. After amassing the signatures of peasants from Western Armenia (where the bulk of the Armenian population in the empire was concentrated), the Armenian Communal Council had petitioned to the Ottoman government to redress the issues that the peasants complained about: "the looting and murder in Armenian towns by [Muslim] Kurds and Circassians, improprieties during tax collection, criminal behavior by government officials and the refusal to accept Christians as witnesses in trial." The Ottoman government considered these grievances and promised to punish those responsible. Following the violent suppression of Christians in the uprisings in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria and Serbia in 1875, the Great Powers invoked the 1856 Treaty of Paris by claiming that it gave them the right to intervene and protect the Ottoman Empire's Christian minorities.[
 

WRITE A COMMENT

Verification code
E-mail is required in case we need to communicate with you. It will not appear on the website and will never be used for any other purposes.
Comments policy: The Daily News seeks and supports freedom of expression and this commitment extends to our readers. Constraints include comments judged to be in violation of Turkish press law. We also moderate hate speech, libel and gratuitous insults.












Home | To Top | User Agreement and Privacy Policy | Rights and Permissions | Contact Us | Company | About News Room| RSS RSS Feed