CANBERRA, Australia - The Associated Press
Australia’s hotel industry has been rocked by a court’s ruling that a prostitute was illegally discriminated against by a motel owner who refused to rent her a room to work from.
The ruling has stunned hotel and motel owners, who thought they had a right to decide what sort of businesses were operating from their premises.
The prostitute, identified only as G.K., had taken her discrimination case against the Drovers Rest Motel in the coal mining town of Moranbah to the Queensland state Civil and Administrative Tribunal after management refused to rent her a room.
The 3 1/2-star motel’s lawyer, David Edwards, said Wednesday that the court notified him this week that it had upheld the prostitute’s claim of discrimination. Edwards confirmed she is seeking damages, reported Wednesday in The Australian newspaper to be 30,000 Australian dollars ($32,000).
The tribunal’s reasons for its decision have not yet been made public.
Prostitution is legal in Queensland, and discrimination based on lawful sexual activity is outlawed.
Prostitutes are streaming to Outback mining towns such as Moranbah, where they base themselves for short periods to cash in on an Australian mining boom fueled by Chinese demand for raw materials.
Edwards said he was considering appealing the ruling.
Richard Munro, chief executive of the Accommodation Association of Australia, a tourism industry lobby group, said the Queensland and Australian governments should consider changing laws to ensure that hotel and motel owners can decide what sort of businesses are being operated under their roofs.
"It’s absolutely illogical," Munro said. "If a hairdresser decided to set up shop in the motel and started inviting people in to get their hair cut, I think the motel owner would have the right to say, ’Hang on, that’s a different business operating out of my business.’"
"If a prostitute decided to start working out of a shopping mall, the owners would have something to say about it. There is some protection for the rights of the motel owner here," he said.
Munro said his group would seek legal advice after hearing the tribunal’s reasons.
He questioned whether prostitution could be legally conducted in an environment such as a motel where there are minors.
He said a prostitute could attract customers late at night who could knock on the wrong door and disturb other guests.
"If the amenity of the guests is disturbed, owners should have the right to protect the overall guests’ experience by removing people who are disturbing the peace," Munro said.
Janelle Fawkes, chief executive of the Scarlet Alliance, Australian Sex Workers Association, said the ruling was a major win for the prostitution industry throughout Australia.
"Accommodation discrimination is a major issue for sex
workers, but it is not by any means the only form of systemic discrimination that sex
workers experience," she said.
"The anti-discrimination legislation in Queensland is very clear that it is illegal to discriminate against someone on the basis of lawful sexual activity, including sex
work, so we appreciate the finding and believe it is a big win for sex
workers throughout Australia because it sends a very clear message that this kind of systemic discrimination will not be tolerated," she said.
The owners of the Drovers Rest Motel declined to comment on the case Wednesday.
The prostitute stayed at the motel 17 times in two years before the owners discovered in 2010 that she was bringing clients to her room. She was then banned from staying there.
She lost her original case before a single tribunal member last year, but appealed before a panel of two.
"Not everyone would choose to do the job I do, but it’s not right that they can treat me like as second-class citizen," she told The Australian.
"They wanted me to go away, but I am a tenacious little terrier, and I would not give up," she said.