LEADING NEWS SOURCE FOR TURKEY AND THE REGION

BURAK BEKDİL > Abhorrence of civilizations

In October 2009, a group of neo-Nazis disguised as Turkish teachers commemorated Hitler in Kayseri in scenes reminiscent of the famous Turkish-Islamist slogan “Now I understand Hitler!” About a month later, the AKP’s local mayor in Rize, Halil Bakirci, said that, “Due to Israel’s policies, we are worried that something undesirable may happen to Israeli tourists.” Bakirci would, in his later political career, be crowned as the man who invented a miracle solution to Turkey’s Kurdish problem: If Turkish men took Kurdish women as second brides, he suggested, there would not be a Kurdish problem.

In “Misalliance of Civilizations” (this column, Nov. 5, 2009), I asked: “Would Sudanese tourists be in danger [in Turkey] because their head of state has an arrest warrant out for crimes amounting to ethnic cleansing? Were Iraqi tourists in danger because of Saddam Hussein’s occupation of Kuwait? Were Iranian tourists in danger because their leader talked about wiping a country off the world map?” And now, three and a half years later, I am asking: Are Syrian civilians in danger in Turkey because their president is bombing his own people? So, what put/puts Israeli tourists in exclusive danger in Turkey if the Turks do not have the habit of holding other nationalities responsible for the acts of their governments?

While the Israeli and international media were busy last week merrily chanting about the “time for an overture to Turkey,” or “a new rapprochement with Turkey” and ringing jingle bells for reviving friendship, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan answered the question in the preceding paragraph, ironically, at a UN event devoted to dialogue between the West and Islam, “Islamophobia ought to be considered a crime against humanity just like Zionism, anti-Semitism and fascism.” Once again, the world was “shocked.”

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon believes “it is unfortunate that such hurtful and divisive comments were uttered at a meeting... under the theme of responsible leadership.” A UN statement said that Erdoğan’s statement was not only wrong but contradicted the very principles on which the Alliance of Civilizations is based.” And Secretary of State John Kerry said “comments by (Erdoğan) equating Zionism to a crime against humanity complicate the efforts to find peace in the Middle East.”

You all may be “shocked” gentlemen, and, once again, I am shocked at your being shocked! Let me refresh your memories: We are talking about a prime minister, the winner of the 2010 Moammar Qadhafi Human Rights Award; a country where half the population votes for him, 65 percent adore his foreign policy; where only four percent have a favorable opinion of Jews, 41 percent believe Judaism is the most violent religion in the world, and only nine percent think Arab groups had carried out 9/11. Welcome to Turkey!

On the other hand, nor is the word phobia (from “phovos” in Greek, meaning morbid fear) accurate to define a crime, like the word xenophobia is often misused in political jargon. How can mere morbid fear of something be a crime? A phobia can only “prompt” a crime if the phobic person commits a crime based on his phobia. And the “Islam” part of the made-up word Islamophobia is also wrong. If Muslims use that word to describe fanatical Muslim-haters or radical anti-Islam, a) they should have invented a better word, like “Islamistophobia,” and b) in more democratic parts of the world hate speech/acts/discrimination are already crimes, regardless of faith or ethnicity.

Most radical behavior against Islam is not in fact against Islam but either against radical interpretations/practices of Islam or against Islamism, especially when the latter publicly targets the ideal of Islamizing non-Muslim lands, cultures and people. As a matter of empirical fact, quite a large number of Muslims, too, are anti-radical Islam/Islamism. “Islamophobes” do not have a phobia of Muslims who have a phobia of radical Islam.

For a better, new, round, perhaps Secretary General Ban should consider reshuffling the top management in the Alliance of Civilizations. My nominees would be Khaleed Meshal of Hamas, Anders Breivik of the Norwegian Defence League, Baruch Marzel of the Jewish National Front party and Nikolaos Michaloliakos of the (Greek) Golden Dawn Party.

March/06/2013

Send to friend »

READER COMMENTS

Click for Hürriyet Daily News comment guidelines

mara mcglothin

3/11/2013 4:50:15 PM

Good one LAZ I do believe you have provided Burak Bey with a new opinion headline!!!

Laz Kemal

3/10/2013 9:25:20 AM

@Mara, I’ve seen that term “mildly Islamist” at another publication which consistently refers to AKP and Erdogan in that manner. And someone used that term and comparison “slightly pregnant” as well. However, PM Erdogan would not agree with “mildly Islamist” as he stated in the past Islam is Islam and no such thing as moderate Islam. Let’s just call it AKP’s “mild Sharia”

Laz Kemal

3/10/2013 9:15:32 AM

@A twice you claimed that I suggested AKP will implement Sharia .. that must be a Freudian slip on your part. I see the classic Turkish Islamist mentality which to defend AKPs Islamism claims AKP will not implement Sharia as we know it. Sharia as implemented by Islamist countries would result in a civil war in Turkiye, Erdogan is too street smart for that. I don’t expect you to understand the correlation that in the last 10 years during AKP regime violence against women increased 14 fold.

Brazilian Observer

3/9/2013 6:54:20 PM

BB, it really doesn't matter if Mr. Erdogan himself is anti-Jew and/or anti-israel., although in my opinion he is both, as much as Iran's Ahmadinedjad or Venezuela's Chavez (may his soul burn in Hell) are. Fact is that he plays the anti-Jew anti-Israel game for his own political gains in a country where, as you mentioned, 65% of the people adore his foreign policy and 41% believ that Judaism, etc... By the way: how many Turks have ever met a Jew? How many know what's Zionism?

mara mcglothin

3/8/2013 4:49:16 PM

AYAZID Right now there is a huge difference and I would prefer to keep it this way. In the USA we say, "Give them an inch and they will take a mile!" I have no problem with anyone's individual beliefs as long as they don't legislate/force them on me, then there is a problem. If Turkey wants to be a democratic country then protection of the minorities is everything.

Ayazid

3/8/2013 11:43:44 AM

@ mara, so according to you, there is basically no difference between, for example, Salafi jihadis and the AKP and both of these groups represent a dangerous Islamism which must be treated as two faces of the same coin? Excuse me, but this is a very distorted, manichean view of thing, which is rather based on lack of knowledge. The fact that it's shared by some secular Turks doesn't make it more true, given the rigid Kemalist tradition, hostile to the presence of religion in public sphere.

Ayazid

3/8/2013 11:32:07 AM

@Laz, Turkish standards for what can be regarded as Islamization and Islamism are quite different from the rest of the Muslim world. The AKP have obviously a conservative Islamic leaning agenda which is logically reflected in their politics, but to present them as some sort of Taliban in disguise who are about to abolish democracy and implement Sharia is absurd. As for the alleged link between the violence on women and AKP rule, this is a pretty bold assertion. Do you have any proofs for this?

Ayazid

3/8/2013 11:25:11 AM

@ mara, it's VERY unlikely that any of those things could be implemented in Turkey. Perhaps if there had been an Islamist counterrevolution 30 or 40 years ago, but today? We are living in a completely different time than were the 70s' in Iran, for example, and establishment of a brand new Islamist regime in a country like Turkey is extremely unlikely to happen.

mara mcglothin

3/7/2013 8:33:27 PM

Yeah LAZ We might want to ask A his opinion on being "mildly pregnant". He, like Mr Akyol don't see the big deal in a few new laws because they haven't affected their daily life as of yet, and when it finally does, it will probably be too late!

Laz Kemal

3/7/2013 6:49:22 PM

@A.I am talking about standards for Republic of Turkey not Mali, Afghanistan, Iran or even Pakistan. Your nonsense but typical “mildly Islamist” AKP defense examples would provoke civil war. Your kind will refuse to see the backwards-ness of random alcohol restrictions throughout the country, or AKP-emboldened teachers, Imams, public demanding a certain distance between boys and girls, preaching women will go to hell if not covered, 14 fold increase in violence against women respectively..manymo
< >

WRITE COMMENT

MOST POPULAR

AcerPro S.I.P.A HTML & CSS Agency