NURAY MERT > A dangerous game of ‘musical chairs’

Print Page Send to friend »
Ahmet Altan, editor-in-chief of daily Taraf and one of the few insightful columnists at the moment, says that political change in Turkey has proven to be a game of “musical chairs.” When the music stops, people sit in different chairs but the game is still the same (Taraf, Aug. 5). The only difference is that the generals are more devout since there is a conservative government in office.

It was military hegemony that previously hindered inquiries concerning human rights abuses, and now it is the civilian government. It was the Republican People’s Party (CHP) which used to attempt to hinder democratic laws by applying to the Constitutional Court for their annulment, and now it is the CHP that is preparing to apply to the U.N. Human Rights Commission and the EU Council of Ministers Committee.
Then, Altan warns that a strong storm is approaching as the tension is intensifying in the Middle East and that Turkey is especially prepared in terms of the Kurdish issue (Taraf, Aug. 16). He suggests that the only way to tackle the storm is to implement more democratization in order to avoid severe complications which appear to be approaching under warlike conditions in the region. Indeed this is the case!

It was a real political crisis situation when CHP MP Hüseyin Aygün was kidnapped by the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) last week, yet the governing party refused to hold an extraordinary meeting in Parliament and refused to recognize its responsibility concerning the security of the roads. Moreover, governmental circles directly and/or indirectly accused the kidnapped MP for his “soft” remarks about the group after he was released.

In fact, Aygün is known for his harsh criticism of the PKK, and he only needed to acknowledge the extent of the problem and used humanistic language concerning the need for peace rather than repeating clichés of patriotism and of hollow curses against the PKK.

In the meantime, on one hand, the prime minister was accusing a media boss for employing critical columnists rather than answering very mild criticism from the columnist (who happened to be the latest target) in the name of accountability. On the other, governmental circles continued to accuse a victim of torture rather than inquiring about the alleged responsibility a recently promoted police chief had in the case, while the infamous interior minister claimed that the tear gas used by Turkish security forcers is 100 percent “natural.”

It seems that Turkey is passing through dire straits domestically and internationally and that nobody knows where it will all lead. The country is on the verge of war with Syria and it seems that only the U.S. reluctance to stage a military assault is stopping the government. Nobody besides the staunch supporters of the ruling party is convinced of the reasons for a possible war.

Recently, the atrocities and human rights abuses by the Free Syrian Army created even more skepticism concerning the Syrian case. Nevertheless, there is no free space left to discuss all these matters. The sectarian divide is starting to take the place of political debate in terms of domestic and regional crises.

The emergency bells have been ringing loudly for a while, but the government does not want to hear them while everyone else is forbidden from speaking out. The most dangerous situation for a country is to ban discussion about any other danger than what the government allows to be called “real danger.” And for the government, there is only one danger to fight against with all means, and that is the PKK.


PRINTER FRIENDLY Send to friend »


Notice on comments

Frederick Melick

8/21/2012 5:28:59 AM

What is it with countries to timid to go to war without the God of War the US, Turkey does not need permission to defend its borders with any country.

dogan kemal ileri

8/20/2012 3:11:45 PM

All politicians and the media in general should rally behind the government of the day when an ongoing war is taking place with terrorists like the PKK.All parliamentary parties should renounce terrorism in no uncertain way and actively support all government military programs undertaken against terrorism.The BDK by never condemming the PKK are actively confessing to be a part of the PKK they shoud be dealt with immediately with stripping of their Turkish citizenship and instant deportation.

Deniz Can

8/20/2012 2:28:12 PM

PART1Mr. Altan is one of the bravest and talented intellectuals. Politics, society and human being are interrelated and dynamic. Changing of one the aspects affect the others. Mr ALTAN, Mrs MERT and many other intellectuals supported the power of the AKP, because it had better plans, projects and politics, in comparison to other parties, for solving Turkey's waiting economic, social and political problems. The objective and subjective conditions were showing that the AKP was a better alternative

Deniz Can

8/20/2012 2:27:53 PM

PART2 The AKP did some positive works. Now these brains, who sported the AKP see that the AKP has changed the agenda, became a party of self-interest. As consequence of these politics, they started to criticize the AKP, which is the right way of doing it. True intellectuals won’t stick to one ideology, because of the dynamic of the issues. Therefore I would suggest people who accused these brains think of the dynamic aspect of environment in which politics and society function.

sid solo

8/20/2012 8:20:26 AM

Ahmet Altan, an insightful columnist? Wasn't it him and his Taraf newspaper alongside all the other cemaat papers and writers, who have in collaboration with the Gülen movement watched, applauded and helped to manoeuvre Turkey into this unprecedented situation in its history in the first place? The same "liberals" like Ahmet Altan, who are now moving away from Erdoğan because they know the use-by-date is up?
< >



AcerPro S.I.P.A HTML & CSS Agency